Tweet
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
12 or 13 seed in Ames???? as no Minneapolis.... against Nebraska.
12 or 13 seed in Ames???? as no Minneapolis.... against Nebraska.
-
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
OklahomaComment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
3. Oklahoma vs. 14. SDSU
In Norman. Not a great draw, but hey, anything can happen.
EDIT: Sunday night at 8:30 PM."All I know is what I read on the message boards."
"Oh, well, there's your problem, then."Comment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
Norman, OK .... 3 Oklahoma vs. 14 SDSUComment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
Probably the proper seed # but what's with ark litle rock gettin a 11?Comment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
I think that's spillover respect for being in Middle Tennessee's conference. That's not supposed to affect the seed but we all know it does.Originally posted by slosho View Post"I think we'll be OK"Comment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
Sweet, a road game to start the tournament. Hopefully a fair amount of Jacks fans can travel to Norman and help make it a little closer to a neutral court atmosphere, as my budget/schedule won't allow me to make the trip.If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple of payments.
- Steven Wright
Comment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
Middle Tn St., last time I checked we beat them... by a Bunch!Originally posted by filbert View Post
Just pulled up expedia.com nothing like $800 plus for tix to OK City...Comment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
Oh, no, certainly not.Originally posted by filbert View Post
The NCAA selection committee is always interested in expanding its horizon, always researching teams, staying on top of things.
They certainly don't favor teams that they're familiar with--conferences that they're familiar with.
And, of course, even though most of the selection committee is based in the eastern US, they are aware of the quality of programs throughout the US. Gonzaga, for instance.................Comment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
[QUOTE=Kemo;150056]Sweet, a road game to start the tournament.[QUOTE]
I for one, am not surprised in the least.
Oh well.
The SOONER we beat them, the better."Life is short so make sure you spend as much time as possible arguing with strangers on the Internet." - PersonComment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
Let's give Tevia Bungo a little credit. He patted SDSU on the back, noting we're the Jackrabbits, back for the second time in only two years of eligibility. It was a very nice, short compliment.
I didn't hear the final punishment meted out by Baylor's coach for the boxer who's playing that team. Is Griner eligible to play in Baylor's first game? Will she be required to wear the heavy gloves like in a title match or just light workout gloves?Comment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
It was 2 games - she's eligibleOriginally posted by JackJD View PostComment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
If a goal of the NCAA is to provide regional matchups,the question that begs to be answered is that since we got a 14 seed and had to play a 3,why wasn't it in Ames rather than Norman ?Comment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
Yeah, the Summit doesn't get us any respect. Maybe if we pull an upset, NEXT year they'll pay attention.Originally posted by bigticket1 View Post
For the record, and I have made the drive about 50 times, Norman is 11.5 hours from Brookings.Holy nutmeg!Comment
-
Re: Bracketology 2010 NCAA Women's Tournament
In answer to the question,why Norman and not Ames,they only have us go one direction....staight south it seems.Comment
Comment