Originally posted by bigticket1
View Post
that said i still do believe that their coverage of the two D1 schools in this state is biased and dishonest. they absolutely represent the two schools as if they have equally successful programs. THEY DO NOT!! and they represent the WBB as if usd is the dominant program and sdsu playing catch up. that is NOT the case
sdsu WBB has not had a significant dropoff in talent since losing Macy. we have had some less success due to injuries and usd having the best 3 year period they have ever had. but now usd has lost those players and maybe they will maintain also?? there are a LOT of players in the portal so maybe they can make up the talent gap but at the moment they DO NOT have the talent returning that they lost and they have nothing in the pipeline to suggest that they will be ready to win multiple games in the ncaa again in the next few years
again i AM NOT saying that they cannot do it. i think it would be dumb to think it is NOT possible!! and while i think they jacks have built enough of a national reputation and THEY WOULD BE FINE even if usd went totally in the toilet. i am actually not hoping for that because i think it is a LITTLE better for the rabbits if usd remains very good. i am not rooting either way!! if they remain good it helps the jacks! if they go in the toilet i will be happy to watch that too and i know the jacks will be just fine
but again my point is that the argus does NOT represent these two programs honestly! barring injuries i believe the jacks will be a top 25 team next year with a chance to have a higher seed in the ncaa than what usd had this year. does argus coverage give any indication of that? NO they have talked about usd losing players and coaches but both articles have said that they have such a great program that it does not matter. NOT TRUE and give no indication of how little the jacks have actually dropped off since macy left
beyond WBB they seem to believe that usd is equal to the jacks in FB because they have won two in a row. that is like saying that the jacks have equaled the bison because we have beaten them more often than not in the last several years. MBB is not even worth talking about. they are NOT CLOSE. they have had success in some of the less major sports but the jacks are gaining success and momentum almost athletic program wide at this point
anyway. it is the only paper to a large degree and if some choose to read it i am not trying to make anyone boycott the paper!!! this began with conversation about Newitt being unfair in his coverage of the jacks. i believe that the argus is FAR FAR MORE UNFAIR and i hope that changes but i have not much belief that it will. i do think that having someone cover the jacks who is an ACTUAL FAN of the jacks would help!!! that does not mean they cannot criticize them!!!! obviously jacks fans on this forum criticize the jacks ALL THE TIME
Comment