2012 recruits

[LakeJack]

Re: 2012 recruits

http://www.argusleader.com/article/2...nclick_check=1

[The Sports Block]

Re: 2012 recruits

March 21st story about Bittle from The Collegian.

http://www.sdsucollegian.com/2012/03...ent-aftermath/

[NoVaJack]

Re: 2012 recruits

March 21st story about Bittle from The Collegian.

http://www.sdsucollegian.com/2012/03...ent-aftermath/

Discuss: Is this the best class yet, with just these two young men? Both sound like solid citizens with precisely the kind of skills the Jacks seek and have not always had depth at. Bittle looks to be a great addition in two places but what is especially intriguing is how how they will use Devine and how quickly he can physically and mentally adjust to the D-1 game. With his size and potential of intimidation factor on defense, he could be a HUGE addition if he can contribute right off the bat next year.

[RabbitObsessed]

Re: 2012 recruits

Impossible to tell now obviously, but any class is going to have trouble topping Wolters, Fiegen, White and Carlson.

[LakeJack]

Re: 2012 recruits

Impossible to tell now obviously, but any class is going to have trouble topping Wolters, Fiegen, White and Carlson.

This.

[Hip2daHop]

Re: 2012 recruits

Any word on the other guys possible for '12?

[SF_Rabbit_Fan]

Re: 2012 recruits

Impossible to tell now obviously, but any class is going to have trouble topping Wolters, Fiegen, White and Carlson.

Various posters questioned the abilities of Fiegen, White, and Carlson over the course of the recent season. Until we have a team of 10 guys who average 25 minutes, 18 points, 10 rebounds, and 10 assists we don't have DI players. /sarcasm

[JACKGUYII]

Re: 2012 recruits

Various posters questioned the abilities of Fiegen, White, and Carlson over the course of the recent season. Until we have a team of 10 guys who average 25 minutes, 18 points, 10 rebounds, and 10 assists we don't have DI players. /sarcasm

I get the sarcasm, but not sure Fiegen, White and Carlson have done anything (yet) to put themselves or recruiting class in the SDSU Hall of Fame.

[jack power]

Re: 2012 recruits

I get the sarcasm, but not sure Fiegen, White and Carlson have done anything (yet) to put themselves or recruiting class in the SDSU Hall of Fame.

Agreed. Removing Nate from that class and it looks pretty average.

[joeboo22]

Re: 2012 recruits

Well I think first of all you have to look at all the classes since going D-I. Having 4 guys from one class, start, contribute and stay around puts them as a solid class. Generally if you have more then 2 per class that contribute before their junior year its considered a really good class. I thought the Cllahan, Kai, group was solid as well. Also the Moss, Sargent group was a strong one. But four in a class who contribute the way they did puts them at the top so far.

[joeboo22]

Re: 2012 recruits

Any word on the other guys possible for '12?

Matt Donlan is visiting tonight/tomorrow on an official.

Stated that IUPUI (who he already has visited), Nebraska and Utah are the top ones. But I read a tweet that said he liked what he has heard from SDSU as well.

I haven't seen him talk about who he has offers from or not.

[KUlawJack]

Re: 2012 recruits

March 21st story about Bittle from The Collegian.

http://www.sdsucollegian.com/2012/03...ent-aftermath/

In the comment section at the end of the article we may have an appearance from the one, the only, lakesbison. The commentor refer Nate as "natalie wolters" as lakesbison does frequently.

[LakeJack]

Re: 2012 recruits

Agreed. Removing Nate from that class and it looks pretty average.

That is a lot like saying "Take away Micheal Jordan and the Bulls teams of the '90s weren't very good". Nate is part of that Class so that Class is one of the best all times. It just is.

[jack power]

Re: 2012 recruits

That is a lot like saying "Take away Micheal Jordan and the Bulls teams of the '90s weren't very good". Nate is part of that Class so that Class is one of the best all times. It just is.

I agree. The poster above removed him to make a point.

[LakeJack]

Re: 2012 recruits

Well I think first of all you have to look at all the classes since going D-I. Having 4 guys from one class, start, contribute and stay around puts them as a solid class. Generally if you have more then 2 per class that contribute before their junior year its considered a really good class. I thought the Cllahan, Kai, group was solid as well. Also the Moss, Sargent group was a strong one. But four in a class who contribute the way they did puts them at the top so far.

This!