Re: Oru 2.0
Source and specifics on Davis? (And, BTW, you can't come "back" to something you have not been to in the first place).
You can't throw a cryptic claim out there to support an argument and expect people to accept your reasoning. And by saying "stink again," you have tacitly conceded Jacks have made improvements. You undermine your own arguments.
Originally posted by rabbit_boy
View Post
Source and specifics on Davis? (And, BTW, you can't come "back" to something you have not been to in the first place).
You can't throw a cryptic claim out there to support an argument and expect people to accept your reasoning. And by saying "stink again," you have tacitly conceded Jacks have made improvements. You undermine your own arguments.
Comment