Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Future Rosters

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bigticket1
    replied
    Originally posted by OldHare View Post

    I had understood that the athletic program would need to find the extra money for extra time players could stay on the roster. There would be a time expanded rosters are fine as long as the program money could be supplied. There is the funding that may determine that extra year. The unintended consequences part of the formula will stretch some programs.
    That won't be quite so hard for smaller roster sports like basketball where you might have 1 or 2 seniors who want to come back. I saw a tweet from a West River reporter who did an interview with Stig, and he said that 13 seniors want to return. That's out of 16 that I counted on the roster. That would amount to a pretty big chunk of change. It's going to force coaches to make some tough decisions on who they want (and can afford) to bring back.

    Leave a comment:


  • OldHare
    replied
    Originally posted by GrandpaLee View Post
    Washington Post writer illustrates with fall sport example that someone loses in the extra year shuffle.
    Clarifications will be forthcoming and re-interpreted continuously in WBB.
    Wary of the qualifier: "... either fewer freshmen can come in or players can't stay for the fifth year..."

    https://twitter.com/EmilyGiam/status...038785/photo/1
    I had understood that the athletic program would need to find the extra money for extra time players could stay on the roster. There would be a time expanded rosters are fine as long as the program money could be supplied. There is the funding that may determine that extra year. The unintended consequences part of the formula will stretch some programs.

    Leave a comment:


  • GrandpaLee
    replied
    Washington Post writer illustrates with fall sport example that someone loses in the extra year shuffle.
    Clarifications will be forthcoming and re-interpreted continuously in WBB.
    Wary of the qualifier: "... either fewer freshmen can come in or players can't stay for the fifth year..."

    https://twitter.com/EmilyGiam/status...038785/photo/1

    Leave a comment:


  • Nidaros
    replied
    Originally posted by GrandpaLee View Post
    Puzzled by the choices all D-1 recruits & coaches face, as a result of the "...extra year of eligibility..." granted by the NCAA.

    Will scholarship rosters expand with an extra year, e.g. Tylee Irwin now playing into 2022?
    Or, are coaches forced to trim to stay within the mandatory roster size (15?), or just redshirt freshmen routinely?

    Again, with the one-time transfer changes imminent, does an open market flourish soon?
    Already 20 players in transfer portal for 2020-21 [ https://wbbblog.com/womens-basketbal...0-summer-2021/ ]

    Overthinking, and missing the obvious ?? Do not see a clear course ahead, and would appreciate help navigating thru the options.
    These are great questions to which I don't have an answer. I do think the one time transfer is a way out for homesick kids. They make a transfer and find the same problems they were having at the former school. So it gives them a chance to grow up in areas that they are vulnerable. They may seem super because they run up and down the floor, but they are 18 to 22 year old's and have emotions just like everyone else. The one transfer in the portal that I thought was interesting is the 6'2" athlete from Rice. Rice is a great school academically. If you are there on a free ride, why would you transfer? Much more to the story I am sure.. This new transfer rule is no doubt going to be interesting. These changes are going to force coaches to make many more evaluations.

    Leave a comment:


  • GrandpaLee
    replied
    Puzzled by the choices all D-1 recruits & coaches face, as a result of the "...extra year of eligibility..." granted by the NCAA.

    Will scholarship rosters expand with an extra year, e.g. Tylee Irwin now playing into 2022?
    Or, are coaches forced to trim to stay within the mandatory roster size (15?), or just redshirt freshmen routinely?

    Again, with the one-time transfer changes imminent, does an open market flourish soon?
    Already 20 players in transfer portal for 2020-21 [ https://wbbblog.com/womens-basketbal...0-summer-2021/ ]

    Overthinking, and missing the obvious ?? Do not see a clear course ahead, and would appreciate help navigating thru the options.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackdaniel
    replied
    ya sure....ha, to be devils advocate here, don't the vast majority of Div1 transfers to Div 1 already have a particular school picked out ahead of time before putting in for a transfer? Seems that way to me. Thanks Grandpa Lee for your input.

    Leave a comment:


  • GrandpaLee
    replied
    Originally posted by jackdaniel View Post
    If we get (4) commitments for '22 , that'd be 13 players for '22, maybe add a grad transfer if they wanted would bring the roster up to 14 players for 2022. Also add (4) more for '23, that'd make 14 on the roster for 2023. I wonder how that would work? Still too many freshmen for those two freshmen classes for those two seasons, '22 and '23 (4) ?

    Jacks now show four roster redshirts. Future R/S's are strong probabilities from injury or developmental needs, which juggles class sizes and recruiting needs.
    Factor in: 319 WBB transfers this year D1-to-D1. Open market?
    Factor in: NCAA soon to allow the one-time transfer with immediate eligibility.
    Oof Da ....

    Leave a comment:


  • jackdaniel
    replied
    Originally posted by WestSideRabbit View Post
    We have 2 seniors this year (Greer and Irwin; Selland was granted a medical hardship). We have 2 corresponding commits Paige Meyer (5'6 PG), and Haleigh Timmer (5'11, SG)

    We have 6 juniors on the roster (Selland, Theuninck, Ferrand, Burckhard, Stapleton, Hirschman). At this point we have 2 commits; Brooklin Meyer (6'2 C) and Ellie Colbeck (5'9, G). I'm guessing they'll look to balance this class out with a juco or grad transfer similar to Greer after this senior class graduates. Bringing in 6 true freshmen would be ALOT.
    If we get (4) commitments for '22 , that'd be 13 players for '22, maybe add a grad transfer if they wanted would bring the roster up to 14 players for 2022. Also add (4) more for '23, that'd make 14 on the roster for 2023. I wonder how that would work? Still too many freshmen for those two freshmen classes for those two seasons , '22 and '23 (4) ?

    Leave a comment:


  • WestSideRabbit
    replied
    We have 2 seniors this year (Greer and Irwin; Selland was granted a medical hardship). We have 2 corresponding commits Paige Meyer (5'6 PG), and Haleigh Timmer (5'11, SG)

    We have 6 juniors on the roster (Selland, Theuninck, Ferrand, Burckhard, Stapleton, Hirschman). At this point we have 2 commits; Brooklin Meyer (6'2 C) and Ellie Colbeck (5'9, G). I'm guessing they'll look to balance this class out with a juco or grad transfer similar to Greer after this senior class graduates. Bringing in 6 true freshmen would be ALOT.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackdaniel
    replied
    Originally posted by bigticket1 View Post

    Ellie Colbeck, 2022 from Fergus Falls, MN. 5'9" G.
    Welcome to Jackrabbit Nation ELLIE ! Here's a highlight VID of her sophomore season, she's a good one, averaged 20.6 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.1 assists and 2.6 steals per game while shooting 47% from two-point range, 49% from three and 80% at the line.Vid won't upload,sorry ...but here's the link:

    https://www.hudl.com/video/3/1388189...f6b80560664f26
    Last edited by jackdaniel; 10-14-2020, 09:20 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigticket1
    replied
    Originally posted by JACKGUYII View Post

    any disclosure on who it is yet?
    Ellie Colbeck, 2022 from Fergus Falls, MN. 5'9" G.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackdaniel
    replied
    Originally posted by JACKGUYII View Post

    any disclosure on who it is yet?
    It was 5 days before Brooklyn confirmed her commitment, so I figured it'd be at least that long if not longer before our new "mystery Jack" reveals her identity to eager fans wondering...."lets see who's hiding behind door #2" ....is it........?? I have no fears though, because everyone the Jacks offer seems to be a stellar basketball player, the coaching staff sees to that.

    Leave a comment:


  • JACKGUYII
    replied
    It will be interesting to see how Alexis Markowski works out at Nebraska. She was not the protoypical and athletic post player we have had in the past.

    Leave a comment:


  • JACKGUYII
    replied
    Originally posted by UWMandSDSU View Post
    AJ with “it’s a great day to be a jackrabbit” tweet.
    any disclosure on who it is yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • UWMandSDSU
    replied
    AJ with “it’s a great day to be a jackrabbit” tweet.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X