Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
NO ONE HAS SAID THE LOSS IS ON CRAWFORD...... what people are saying is he didn't give the team a chance to win, it seems like when he is in there the offense plays not to lose the game..... When you are playing not to lose a game and don't execute it..... you are expecting a lot from your defense....
What I am saying is this.... with Crawford in there we have no deep threat, with no deep threat, teams stack the box, making the running game harder, with the running game being stuffed because of the 8-9 guys in the box you are put in 3rd and long situations in which Crawford is not a QB for 3rd and long situations..... with that you get a lot of 4th downs, which means you punt... putting your defense back on the field....
SIU blitzed and stacked the box the whole first half..... and of the 6 sacks atleast 3 of them he held onto way to long.... when a team is stacking the box and blitzing there should be an open guy.... the line gave him enough time on most of the blitzed to find the open guy and he just didn't do it....
Originally posted by zooropa
View Post
What I am saying is this.... with Crawford in there we have no deep threat, with no deep threat, teams stack the box, making the running game harder, with the running game being stuffed because of the 8-9 guys in the box you are put in 3rd and long situations in which Crawford is not a QB for 3rd and long situations..... with that you get a lot of 4th downs, which means you punt... putting your defense back on the field....
SIU blitzed and stacked the box the whole first half..... and of the 6 sacks atleast 3 of them he held onto way to long.... when a team is stacking the box and blitzing there should be an open guy.... the line gave him enough time on most of the blitzed to find the open guy and he just didn't do it....
Comment