Originally posted by Hammersmith
View Post
If anything, the past three years of thumb-twiddling, thumb sucking, and thumb sitting (hopefully in that order), demonstrates that the SBoHE is unfit to handle any serious issue affecting the university system--and (theoretically) a more powerful argument for legislative overhaul (and perhaps micromanagement) than decisive action on the issue.
I mean, if the SBoHE is afraid that acting decisively in a fashion that is temporarily unpopular will bring calls for stricter oversight from legislative yay-hoos, then what will be the consequence of doing nothing for three years?
IMO, a logical and reasoned case can be made for overhauling ND's university governance, based on this & the Chapman debacle. Whereas calls to overhaul the SBoHE based on a decision to drop the nickname would come across as nothing more than sour grapes from legislators that have no idea where their true responsibilities lie.
And maybe I'm completely out in left field here, but I just don't get the hysterical attachment to the nickname. Cryin' out loud. I got a great education from South Dakota State, regardless of what their athletic program calls itself, and I am impressed by the conduct and character of SDSU's coaches and athletes, regardless of what the team mascot looks like.
As Juliet said (more or less), 'a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.'
Leave a comment: