Originally posted by jakejc795
View Post
and i do think that the main idea of the ncaa is "supposed to be" to promote athletes and athletics and education. of course we know their FIRST purpose is to make money, but i do think they are supposed to do those other things as well
and if those are goals, i think it would take some external force like the ncaa or nit to incentivize different scheduling and giving more schools opportunities to first of all just have games against P5 schools and then to occasionally host those games. and that was the part of your idea i agree with. having someone like the NIT or as i said the ncaa get more involved
and when you think about it, it is incredibly rare for any school to play more than one game in the tournament against a mid major school. and yes maybe they would play one smaller school two years in a row. so it would seem like maybe at most they could be required to play 2 or 3 games against mid major schools in ANY single season. i think most big schools play about 35 games, i dont think 1 or 2 against a mid major would kill them
also you could say that if neither school wants to play the rematch game or games then it would not be required. i imagine some smaller schools would opt out. i feel like that would be a mistake, but if they made the tournament with a group of seniors who would be gone and they feel like they would be embarrassed in a rematch they could choose to opt out
anyway, HAHA, it is not like me thinking this through is going to make any difference, but as to coach close she seemed quite passionate about places like brookings being a blessing to WBB. she could quite easily back that up i would imagine if she chooses to
Comment