Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why we'll be better next year....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why we'll be better next year....

    THE SUMMIT:
    Oakland should take the conference easily ahead of.......ORU should be behind them and firmly ahead of......IUPUI loses one significant player (13ppg) from a team that finished 4th last year and lost alot of close games (lost by 1 in OT to Az State, by 3 to Indiana and 3 to NDSU) just like....SDSU returns everybody and adds a couple redshirts as well as a couple solid recruits, similar to another young rival named.....NDSU loses alot but they also have some young talent. I think they'll be better than people expect. Them and.......IPFW probably aren't good enough to finish ahead of Oak, ORU, IUPUI or SDSU but they are sure to finish above....Centenary, WIU, UMKC and SUU are all but locked into being the bottom four teams.
    Predicted order of finish:
    1.) Oakland
    2.) ORU
    3.) IUPUI
    4.) SDSU
    5.) NDSU
    6.) IPFW
    7.) SUU
    8.) Centenary
    9.) WIU
    10.) UMKC

    THE HEARTBREAKERS:
    It's no secret that SDSU suffered some heartbreakers this year to say the least. SDSU lost 11 games by 8 points or less including three games by 3 or less and two overtime games. In those losses two were via halfcourt shots. If the Jacks pull off just 4 of those close 11 games we're talking about a 17 win season and a top 4 finish in conference, a very successful season. This year the Jacks will be the experienced team in the majority of their Summit contests and it's safe to believe some of those close losses will turn into wins.

    THE UN-SUMMITS:
    This is the only area highlighted in this post where the Jacks could finish the same or worse then last year and that's due to the competetion. It's going to be tough to get a win against any three any of the Paradise jam teams, not to mention the game at Minnesota. At least one home versus a "non-counter" will be a win and the home games against Denver and Cal-Poly are also great chances at wins. The game in Wyoming will be a tough one, but not unwinnable. With the Paradise Jam games and the Minny game I can see SDSU finishing somewhere around .500 in non-conference, something like 7-6 or 6-7 (last year SDSU went 5-8 w/ tough games vs Minny, ISU, Drake, UNI and VCU).


    THE ROAD:
    It's also no secret that the Jacks have, well, stunk on the road. Go figure their only road win of the year was versus a Big XII team w/ a NBA bound player in a tough arena full of "magic". A third winless year on the road simply will not happen now that the Jacks are suddenly one of the more experienced teams in conference. In fact, after their first road game of the year at IUPUI, the next 5 are all very winnable (WIU, UMKC, SUU, NDSU and Centenary). When the Jacks win their 2nd and 3rd conference road games of the year at WIU and UMKC they will have the confidence they lacked the last two years. There are just three conference road games where the Jacks are overmatched (Oak, ORU and IUPUI).

    THE RETURNING RABBITS:
    The Jacks welcome back all 5 starters, the top 7 scorers, top 9 rebounders...you get the picture, basically everyone is back. Of the two players leaving, Mackenzie Casey played the 7th most minutes and Troy Wipf played the least, just 29 minutes all year. Even if they were coming back there would be no spot for them. There is every reason to believe that every player will be much improved, especially considering 6 of the returners were just sophmore or freshmen last year and a guy like Kai Williams should be able to stay at his natural 3 spot and not have to log so many minutes at the 4.

    THE BABY RABBITS:
    A couple long wing players take off the redshirts. 6'7 James Rader and 6'8 Dwight Pederson are both guys who can stroke it from the outside. Rader averaged 18 and 9 in Colorado, where he was 2nd team all-state his senior year. Pederson transfered from USF where he played in every game as a true freshman, averaging 6 points, shot 49% from the field and led all Cougars with a 46% 3-point shooting percentage. As for the incoming freshmen, coming fresh off a SD state A championship are high school teammates 6'7 guard Chad White and 6'8 forward Tony Fiegen. The athletic Fiegen averaged 19 and 10 while shooting over 65% in the paint, set school records for points and field goals and was the SD Gatorade POTY. The do-it-all White averaged 16 ppg, 5.5 rpg and 4 apg while proving to be an excellent ball handler and all around player. Brayden Carlson is the first Brrokings player in over 15 years to suit up for the hometown Jacks. The 6'5 Carlson played the point for the Bobcats this year while averaging 22 ppg, 8 rpg, 3.5 apg, 2 spg, 1.5 bspg and shot 53% from the field. In one six game stretch the SD first team pick averaged 30.5 ppg. He will redshirt his first year. Another addition could be 6'10/240 center Anthony Davis. Davis, a juco transfer sat out last year due to injury and his status for this year in unknown. His sophmore year at SWCC Davis averaged 16 ppg, 6 rpg and 2 bspg. Griffan Callahan transefered from UND and wasn't able to play until last year until second semester. He averaged 16ppg, 9 rpg, 6 apg, 4 spg in Illinois where he was named first team all-state as a senior. Callahan will have the advantage this year of being eligible to play from game one. These additions will easily make this the deepest Jackrabbit team since the move to D1 five years prior.

    SUMMARY:
    SDSU is quite possibly the most improved team in the Summit......there is every reason to believe that some of those close losses will turn into wins....the non conference will have it's tough teams as well as overmatched opponents....the road will be a much friednlier place for a more experienced and deeper Jacks squad....all of last years impact players return to go along with a couple redshirt frosh, a couple true frosh and possibly a 6'10 junior center. 2009-10 is set to be the year that SDSU turns the corner. They should finish above .500 and could even challenge for the conference.

  • #2
    Re: Why we'll be better next year....

    I believe we will go 17-1 in conference play.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Why we'll be better next year....

      I believe we will go 17-1 in conference play.
      If there were a law you had to use the word "impossible" once every day, this would be the time I would use it. At Oakland and at ORU will both be very, very tough. We haven't won a conference road game in two years.

      I think 3-6 or 4-5 on the road and 7-2 at home is very realistic. That would put us somewhere around 10-8 in conference. And I think .500 in our non-conference schedule is also realistic, meaning our final record would be 2-4 games above .500

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Why we'll be better next year....

        Originally posted by TeaJackrabbit View Post
        If there were a law you had to use the word "impossible" once every day, this would be the time I would use it. At Oakland and at ORU will both be very, very tough. We haven't won a conference road game in two years.

        I think 3-6 or 4-5 on the road and 7-2 at home is very realistic. That would put us somewhere around 10-8 in conference. And I think .500 in our non-conference schedule is also realistic, meaning our final record would be 2-4 games above .500
        My guess would be 13-5 in conference play based on the players we have returning, kids we are bringing in for next season, and the players opposing teams are losing. We'll be a deeper team (10 to 11 players could see legitimate PT every game) and we'll have some seniors and juniors next year who I believe figured out what they needed to do to win games. Plus, I think SDSU has next year's Summit League MVP in Anthony Cordova.
        If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple of payments.
        - Steven Wright

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Why we'll be better next year....

          My guess would be 13-5 in conference play based on the players we have returning, kids we are bringing in for next season, and the players opposing teams are losing. We'll be a deeper team (10 to 11 players could see legitimate PT every game) and we'll have some seniors and juniors next year who I believe figured out what they needed to do to win games.
          I think 13-5 is very, very possible. High water is probably 14-4, low water 8-10.

          Yes, we'll be deeper. In a 10 man rotation we lost Mack. We add White, Fiegen, Rader and Pederson (almost a given that Davis isn't playing), plus we get Griff for the whole year. We're just not very big, but we should be more athletic and more dangerous from long distance.

          Rotation?
          PG - Moss...............Palarca
          SG - Ga. Callahan.....Gr. Callahan.....Rader
          SG - Sargent...........White.............Rader/Pederson
          PF - Williams...........Fiegen............Cassaday/Pederson?
          PF - Corodva...........Fiegen............Engen

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Why we'll be better next year....

            Plus, I think SDSU has next year's Summit League MVP in Anthony Cordova.
            Boy, I would love for him just to get first team. I think League MVP is going to be real tough. I think Oakland has 4 guys that could all win it.

            I'll take Oaklands Benson or Jones against the field.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Why we'll be better next year....

              I like a rotation of:

              G-Ga. Callahan
              G-Sargent
              G-White
              F-Williams
              F-Cordova

              Four guys that can knock down the trey and a physical guy inside. Bring in Fiegen for Williams and you trade an outside threat for a bigger body and the athleticism is still very good.

              It's going to be alot of fun....alot MORE fun starting next year!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Why we'll be better next year....

                Originally posted by TeaJackrabbit View Post
                I think 13-5 is very, very possible. High water is probably 14-4, low water 8-10.

                Yes, we'll be deeper. In a 10 man rotation we lost Mack. We add White, Fiegen, Rader and Pederson (almost a given that Davis isn't playing), plus we get Griff for the whole year. We're just not very big, but we should be more athletic and more dangerous from long distance.

                Rotation?
                PG - Moss...............Palarca
                SG - Ga. Callahan.....Gr. Callahan.....Rader
                SG - Sargent...........White.............Rader/Pederson
                PF - Williams...........Fiegen............Cassaday/Pederson?
                PF - Corodva...........Fiegen............Engen
                If we do end up landing Wolters (and it sounds like there is a good chance of that happening) and he doesn't red shirt, you can add him to the depth chart... plus I have heard from a source far more knowledgeable on the kid than myself that Rader put on a lot of muscle and has a solid post game, so he could be in the rotation at the 4 as well.

                There is a lot of offseason development to go before next season, so hopefully we will see some pleasant suprises next season that we have no real way of anticipating at this point and time.
                If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple of payments.
                - Steven Wright

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Why we'll be better next year....

                  Originally posted by Kemo View Post
                  If we do end up landing Wolters (and it sounds like there is a good chance of that happening) and he doesn't red shirt, you can add him to the depth chart... plus I have heard from a source far more knowledgeable on the kid than myself that Rader put on a lot of muscle and has a solid post game, so he could be in the rotation at the 4 as well.

                  There is a lot of offseason development to go before next season, so hopefully we will see some pleasant suprises next season that we have no real way of anticipating at this point and time.
                  Rader and Feigen are pretty much the same player, just Rader has a better shot.... I'd be hesitent to put him at the 2 guard... hes more of a 3/4.....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Why we'll be better next year....

                    Originally posted by TeaJackrabbit View Post
                    Boy, I would love for him just to get first team. I think League MVP is going to be real tough. I think Oakland has 4 guys that could all win it.

                    I'll take Oaklands Benson or Jones against the field.
                    Oakland's overall balance might hurt those two in the MVP race, though I do believe both will be first team all conference. I would take Cordova's offensive game over Benson's, as I think Cordova will have better numbers than him in both the points and assist categories, which are more prominent MVP statistics than blocks and rebounds. Benson, in my mind, will be the defensive player of the year rather than the MVP. I could see Jones definately take it too, but I can see Nelson stealing some of his sunshine, which could reduce some of his stats and ultimately his chance at MVP.

                    Look for Cordova's stat line to read roughly 15-8-5 (pts/reb/ast), as are offense seemed to be the most efficient last year when we were working it through him, and I can see a lot of emphasis on that in the offseason.
                    If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple of payments.
                    - Steven Wright

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Why we'll be better next year....

                      Perhaps Nate Wolters should be added to the mix, too. He's certainly capable of making an immediate contribution.
                      This space for lease.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Why we'll be better next year....

                        Originally posted by Just in the crowd View Post
                        I believe we will go 17-1 in conference play.
                        hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Why we'll be better next year....

                          you guys will definately be tough. but oakland, oru are still top dawgs. and this board had NDSU very under-rated. they won't be great but they wont be that bad either

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Why we'll be better next year....

                            Originally posted by Just in the crowd View Post
                            I believe we will go 17-1 in conference play.
                            I assume, based on previous posts, that there is some sarcasm in this post.
                            "I'd like to thank the good Lord for making me a Yankee." - Joe D.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Why we'll be better next year....

                              Originally posted by TeaJackrabbit View Post
                              If there were a law you had to use the word "impossible" once every day, this would be the time I would use it. At Oakland and at ORU will both be very, very tough. We haven't won a conference road game in two years.

                              I think 3-6 or 4-5 on the road and 7-2 at home is very realistic. That would put us somewhere around 10-8 in conference. And I think .500 in our non-conference schedule is also realistic, meaning our final record would be 2-4 games above .500
                              I for one will be very dissapointed if we don't go undefeated in conference play at Frost. We went 7-2 last season and will be much better next year. Part of the improvement is making Frost hostile again. The last 4 years of D-2 we lost 4 games total. We need to get back to winning like that at home. I think we will go something like 5-4 on the road (IUPUI, ORU, OU, and one egg layed).
                              Go Big! Go Blue! Go Jacks!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X