Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mitchellrabbit
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Thats right. Offense is the problem. We need to score more than 93 points to win a game and Flatten wont help us do that.

    Leave a comment:


  • MontanaRabbit
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by mitchellrabbit View Post
    Whats happened with Flatten lately? He only played 11 minutes last night and 0 pts. Missed a jam. Vs Western he played 5 minutes, 0 pts. Against USD he played 27 minutes and 0 Pts. He scored 11 against NDSU with 24 minutes. So what happened after the USD game that he has played less. I was really excited to have him back. What happened since USD? They need him in there. Or maybe coach is playing his players, Reed and Daum. IDK And Reed has struggled
    I think you answered your own question. He hasn't scored since the NDSU game. Otz said at the presser yesterday hes searching for someone to me more consistent on the offensive end. He's right that there hasnt been a consistent second threat.

    We can argue all day weather that's the biggest issue.....

    Leave a comment:


  • mitchellrabbit
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Whats happened with Flatten lately? He only played 11 minutes last night and 0 pts. Missed a jam. Vs Western he played 5 minutes, 0 pts. Against USD he played 27 minutes and 0 Pts. He scored 11 against NDSU with 24 minutes. So what happened after the USD game that he has played less. I was really excited to have him back. What happened since USD? They need him in there. Or maybe coach is playing his players, Reed and Daum. IDK And Reed has struggled

    Leave a comment:


  • minnesotarabbit
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by jakejc795 View Post
    First, let me offer several disclaimers -- I've never played organized basketball, never attended a Jacks' practice, and never met any player or coach personally -- I have no idea what TJ's true system is this season, whether it's a temporary adaptation reflecting what he and the other staff sees as roster realities/limitations, whether it's indicative of any lack of skill he has as a coach or motivator, or whether it may change next season.

    I've said he's made decisions I don't understand, like sitting King, and I don't like watching them lose; however, I don't think individuals on this forum have any right to lie about coach-player interactions when refutative evidence is readily available in the form of statements TJ makes during a press conference (and that person saw the dang video) or to dismiss significant roster turnover as whining.
    I hear you, I have no idea about coach/player interactions nor do I know what tj is thinking at press conference. I'm guessing he's pretty frustrated like everyone else, that being said, it may be time for him to look in mirror and make a few changes and see if it helps...cause it can't get much worse

    Leave a comment:


  • jakejc795
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by minnesotarabbit View Post
    His system?? Is his system to play a soft zone 40 minutes a game/every game? I keep hearing he's never played zone, maybe he just doesn't know how to coach a zone or maybe try something else 1,5,10,15,30 minutes a game to mix it up
    First, let me offer several disclaimers -- I've never played organized basketball, never attended a Jacks' practice, and never met any player or coach personally -- I have no idea what TJ's true system is this season, whether it's a temporary adaptation reflecting what he and the other staff sees as roster realities/limitations, whether it's indicative of any lack of skill he has as a coach or motivator, or whether it may change next season.

    I've said he's made decisions I don't understand, like sitting King, and I don't like watching them lose; however, I don't think individuals on this forum have any right to lie about coach-player interactions when refutative evidence is readily available in the form of statements TJ makes during a press conference (and that person saw the dang video) or to dismiss significant roster turnover as whining.

    Leave a comment:


  • minnesotarabbit
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by jakejc795 View Post
    I've already listed the players lost, so to borrow your analogy, some aren't even giving him time to truly prep his "meal," let alone let it cook. It's not like he was left with a Hungry Man dinner he just had to pop in the microwave.

    Now, jacksstudent raised some valid points about possible incongruence between TJ's background and characteristics of successful Summit teams, but TJ was purportedly hired by a committee that was aware of that and should have considered the implications. TJ should not be faulted for their oversight, if one occurred; holding him responsible for his decisions, given time to implement his system is another matter
    His system?? Is his system to play a soft zone 40 minutes a game/every game? I keep hearing he's never played zone, maybe he just doesn't know how to coach a zone or maybe try something else 1,5,10,15,30 minutes a game to mix it up

    Leave a comment:


  • BitsTD
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by MontanaRabbit View Post
    Drunk?
    Pretty much.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • bigticket1
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    I'll bite on the cupboard not being bare, especially at the PG position. The Jacks returned no players that had any playing time at point guard last year - that's zero minutes in 30 games. Before this year, we've been spoiled for a number of seasons with Marshall, Carlson and Wolters at the position. To get some perspective for how Nagy-coached teams performed with lesser quality PG's, I looked back at the pre-Wolters era. In the 9/10 season Nate started 11 games as a freshman and senior Michael Palarca started the rest. The other starters were Clint Sargent, Garrett Callahan, Kai Williams and Anthony Cordova. That team was 14-16. In 8/9, Palarca and Mackensie Casey split time at PG and the rest of the starting line-up was the same as 9/10 - they finished 13-20. In the 7/8 season (1st in the Summit), the PG's were Palarca and Casey with Sargent, Williams,Callahan and Ben Beran. That team finished 8-21. Conclusions ? As much as I like Mike Daum, I would rate those starting line-ups of Sargent, Kai Williams, Garrett Callahan and Cordova/Beran (with Dale Moss coming off the bench) as at least as good, if not better than what we are running out this year. And they never finished with a .500 record when playing with below average PG's. So Nagy coached teams also had years where results were not exactly stellar with decent talent at every position other than PG.

    Leave a comment:


  • JACKGUYII
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    We have enough talent to play better on the offensive and defensive end.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakejc795
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by OldHare View Post
    There you again putting words into my mouth! The agenda is seeing a bunch of wins this year and no more whiny excuses. College kids graduate every year and leave holes.
    Maybe you should spend less time psychoanalyzing a coach's presser and more on self-introspection. What's at issue isn't the words people "put in your mouth," it's the words you omit from your posts. You grossly mischaracterized TJ's on-the-record statements concerning Gentry, and you dismiss significant roster transitions which impact depth, game lineups, and competitiveness as "whiny excuses."

    Sorry, but Daum's presence alone and preseason plaudits don't win games, and it takes time to implement new systems. You'd figure an expert like you would know that.

    Leave a comment:


  • OldHare
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by jakejc795 View Post
    Considerably different circumstances -- how about you take the next step and list who replaced those departures and how long they'd been in program?

    The "presser psych." and your refusal to acknowledge basic facts reveal you have an agenda.
    There you again putting words into my mouth! The agenda is seeing a bunch of wins this year and no more whiny excuses. College kids graduate every year and leave holes.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakejc795
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by OldHare View Post
    Brayden Carlson, Jordan Dykstra, Marcus Heemstra, and Chad White are more names that left one season due to graduation. That happens in the college game. How did the next year turn out? It was 24-11 and a trip to the NIT. The freshmen Tellinghuisen and Theisen were the new projects. Anyone wanting a box dinner like Hungryman is not a cook.
    Considerably different circumstances -- how about you take the next step and list who replaced those departures and how long they'd been in program?

    The "presser psych." and your refusal to acknowledge basic facts reveal you have an agenda.

    Leave a comment:


  • OldHare
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by jakejc795 View Post
    I've already listed the players lost, so to borrow your analogy, some aren't even giving him time to truly prep his "meal," let alone let it cook. It's not like he was left with a Hungry Man dinner he just had to pop in the microwave.

    Now, jacksstudent raised some valid points about possible incongruence between TJ's background and characteristics of successful Summit teams, but TJ was purportedly hired by a committee that was aware of that and should have considered the implications. TJ should not be faulted for their oversight, if one occurred; holding him responsible for his decisions, given time to implement his system is another matter
    Brayden Carlson, Jordan Dykstra, Marcus Heemstra, and Chad White are more names that left one season due to graduation. That happens in the college game. How did the next year turn out? It was 24-11 and a trip to the NIT. The freshmen Tellinghuisen and Theisen were the new projects. Anyone wanting a box dinner like Hungryman is not a cook.

    By the way Parks and Marshall came too. Parks was a big scorer from JUCO that turned into a premier defensive player and he still scored a few points. That is another discussion.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakejc795
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by OldHare View Post
    The cupboard is not bare. A great cook can find a recipe with the ingredients available. It is time to forget you heard the cupboard is bare. Put on the big boy pants and put the food on the table. Your post truth or fake news seems to waver around a bare cupboard. If you sign up to be a cook, every meal will not be hamburger.
    I've already listed the players lost, so to borrow your analogy, some aren't even giving him time to truly prep his "meal," let alone let it cook. It's not like he was left with a Hungry Man dinner he just had to pop in the microwave.

    Now, jacksstudent raised some valid points about possible incongruence between TJ's background and characteristics of successful Summit teams, but TJ was purportedly hired by a committee that was aware of that and should have considered the implications. TJ should not be faulted for their oversight, if one occurred; holding him responsible for his decisions, given time to implement his system is another matter

    Leave a comment:


  • OldHare
    replied
    Re: GDT: SDSU vs Omaha

    Originally posted by jakejc795 View Post
    The issue is that your game of "connect the dots" is deliberately ignoring already connected dots; namely, TJ praising Cole and your continued refusal to acknowledge that he's had to replace basically an entire starting five. Moreover, you seem to contradict yourself in that you criticize surplus scholarship offers and failure to obtain results. Ever think that maybe extra scholarships offers were made because current players requested permission to explore transfer opportunities?

    As for trying to prove anything to you -- it seems you're a reveler in this "post-truth" world we live in, so I'll let you get back to parsing pressers for psychological tells (just please realize that sometimes looking down is simply looking at stats).
    The cupboard is not bare. A great cook can find a recipe with the ingredients available. It is time to forget you heard the cupboard is bare. Put on the big boy pants and put the food on the table. Your post truth or fake news seems to waver around a bare cupboard. If you sign up to be a cook, every meal will not be hamburger.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X