Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Edit: I'm stupid #1.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Playoffs 2016: Nova
Collapse
X
-
Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Originally posted by jakejc795 View PostYou'll have to forgive me for interpreting TK's diatribe as supporting such a tack and for doing the same with statements made in the Bison GDT.
It'd be great if similar questions were asked of those asserting that Stig "apologists" are basking in mediocrity.
Some of those who crying for his head probably have never put on the pads and your life is not perfect but you seem to expect perfection from a 9-4 football team. I am willing to bet that the entire team and coach staff are very disappointed about how the game turned out Saturday. Now they wait for next year. Are you in?Last edited by Nidaros; 12-14-2016, 10:59 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Originally posted by jack power View PostWho is suggesting he should be fired now?
It'd be great if similar questions were asked of those asserting that Stig "apologists" are basking in mediocrity.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Originally posted by TK22867 View PostI agree wholeheartedly. The clear line in the sand on this board is those who are satisfied waiting for the Bison to stumble and come back to us and the field, while others demand accountability for why we are not there already. That division is clear and won't be rectified anytime soon.
My issue has always been about the playcalls in certain situations. These are not simply "bad" play calls as others have tried to sugarcoat it. These are bush league calls that are indefensible, yet no one else here wants to hold those coaches accountable for their utter stupidity in those situations. There, the bone is picked.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Originally posted by jakejc795 View PostI guarantee you that any coach you think could replace Stig will have a TK22867 somewhere railing against his "bush league" calls too.
If you want to cherry pick statements, let me state it slightly differently, I want the Jacks to become a long-term competitor for the Bison, not a flash in the pan that may advance to the FCS Championship and then falter in subsequent years. Accountability does not always mean firing someone, and if you are going to fire a coach after a season like this one, you probably better be ready to change coaches every couple years.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Originally posted by TK22867 View PostI agree wholeheartedly. The clear line in the sand on this board is those who are satisfied waiting for the Bison to stumble and come back to us and the field, while others demand accountability for why we are not there already. That division is clear and won't be rectified anytime soon.
My issue has always been about the playcalls in certain situations. These are not simply "bad" play calls as others have tried to sugarcoat it. These are bush league calls that are indefensible, yet no one else here wants to hold those coaches accountable for their utter stupidity in those situations. There, the bone is picked.
If you want to cherry pick statements, let me state it slightly differently, I want the Jacks to become a long-term competitor for the Bison, not a flash in the pan that may advance to the FCS Championship and then falter in subsequent years. Accountability does not always mean firing someone, and if you are going to fire a coach after a season like this one, you probably better be ready to change coaches every couple years.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Originally posted by filbert View PostThe main problem is that SDSU is just down the road a couple of hours from a program, the success of which puts Alabama to shame.
THAT'S the big problem in Brookings.
My issue has always been about the playcalls in certain situations. These are not simply "bad" play calls as others have tried to sugarcoat it. These are bush league calls that are indefensible, yet no one else here wants to hold those coaches accountable for their utter stupidity in those situations. There, the bone is picked.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Originally posted by filbert View PostThe main problem is that SDSU is just down the road a couple of hours from a program, the success of which puts Alabama to shame.
THAT'S the big problem in Brookings.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Originally posted by jakejc795 View PostCripes, when did arguing for rationally examining the situation and realizing that progress has been made become being satisfied with mediocrity, and generally a .692 record isn't considered mediocre.
THAT'S the big problem in Brookings.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Originally posted by TK22867 View PostSo, when are we allowed to increase expectations for this program? Asking for a friend.
Rapid success is often rooted in unsustainable practices or reliance on a few key players and followed by irrelevance (think U of Miami), and I would much prefer continued success grounded on a stable foundation.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Playoffs 2016: Nova
Originally posted by TK22867 View PostSo, when are we allowed to increase expectations for this program? Asking for a friend.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: