Originally posted by filbert
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Future Schedules
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Re: Future Schedules
November 12, 2016, USD @ SDSU.
Brand shiny new stadium.
Brand shiny new attendance record?
Closed circuit to Justin Sell: Are you SURE you want to put in only 18,500 seats?Last edited by filbert; 10-10-2013, 05:33 PM. Reason: Added smiley which somehow got neglected in the first edition of the post
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Future Schedules
KU back on the schedule. I like it. I also like seeing a powderpuff like Robert Morris on there too. Also like the TCU game. That trip to Dallas should be a blast.
Do not like playing NDSU so early in the season. I would rather have them late when we have them at home. I wish they would put either USD or NDSU as the last game of the season each year for our home schedule. Wishful thinking I guess.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Future Schedules
Originally posted by mitchellrabbit View Posthttp://www.gojacks.com/ViewArticle.d...CLID=209281013
Getting the schedules set for the next 3 yrs. Glad to see Cal Poly coming here again.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Future Schedules
http://www.gojacks.com/ViewArticle.d...CLID=209281013
Getting the schedules set for the next 3 yrs. Glad to see Cal Poly coming here again.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Future Schedules
Originally posted by joeboo22 View PostHope for a buyout and try to get Nebraska, Kansas/Kansas State or Iowa State instead? Or hope you play the game? $400K for doing nothing wouldn't be the worst thing, but would probably want to find another game anyways.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Future Schedules
Hope for a buyout and try to get Nebraska, Kansas/Kansas State or Iowa State instead? Or hope you play the game? $400K for doing nothing wouldn't be the worst thing, but would probably want to find another game anyways.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Future Schedules
Originally posted by KUlawJack View PostThis is not legal advice. Repeat, I do not represent you and this is not legal advice.* Its just my own personal thoughts.
Contracts can be assigned. A contract with an assignment clause could require the non-assigning party to consent to any assignment. On the other hand, Minnesota may have said they want the clause to read that the contract is assignable without the other party's consent. It's not always a matter of someone screwing up when the other party exercises their rights under the contract and may have been bargained for in the negotiating process.
There is also something called novation, where one original party to the contract is replaced by another party. This requires consent of all parties.
Those are just some random thoughts on the subject and in no way is it any in-depth legal analysis.
*Not directed at you specifically SDSUAlum08. Just putting that out there so no one thinks I'm analyzing SDSU's contract or representing them or anyone else in any way.
Keep in mind, none of us know the terms of the contract so this is all speculation and guess work.Last edited by Nidaros; 05-08-2013, 09:13 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Re: Future Schedules
Originally posted by SDSUAlum08 View PostIf SDSU ok'd the move to TCU then I can understand, but was it a mistake by State in the contract that allowed them to do it.
Contracts can be assigned. A contract with an assignment clause could require the non-assigning party to consent to any assignment. On the other hand, Minnesota may have said they want the clause to read that the contract is assignable without the other party's consent. It's not always a matter of someone screwing up when the other party exercises their rights under the contract and may have been bargained for in the negotiating process.
There is also something called novation, where one original party to the contract is replaced by another party. This requires consent of all parties.
Those are just some random thoughts on the subject and in no way is it any in-depth legal analysis.
*Not directed at you specifically SDSUAlum08. Just putting that out there so no one thinks I'm analyzing SDSU's contract or representing them or anyone else in any way.
Keep in mind, none of us know the terms of the contract so this is all speculation and guess work.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Future Schedules
Originally posted by BigGoosie13 View PostAccording to TV we are going to be playing TCU in 2015, this is good and bad. IMO, TCU is better than the Gophers so it lessens our chances of an upset, however this could be our chance for a Top 25 upset.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Future Schedules
According to TV we are going to be playing TCU in 2015, this is good and bad. IMO, TCU is better than the Gophers so it lessens our chances of an upset, however this could be our chance for a Top 25 upset.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Future Schedules
Originally posted by SUPERBUNNY View PostIs there a downside to this? $400,000 in the bank. Now can schedule another game. Here's an idea, take some of that $400,000 and make sure we have a 6th home game. SUPERBUNNY
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Future Schedules
I wouldn't think a contract like this would be written such that it could be sold from one host school to another, but the devil's in the details.
My best guess is that Minny and TCU just agreed that TCU would fork over the buyout of SDSU from Minny's contract.
TCU and SDSU would (and always have been) free to negotiate a game between them, but that would be separate and distinct from the SDSU-Minny contract.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: