Summit League Post-Season

[mitchellrabbit]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

Of the 351 teams, how many are without a conference? Dang few so what would be the change?

I dont think there are any without a conference anymore. NJIT was the last one without a conference and then they joined the Atlantic Sun

[mitchellrabbit]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

Holy Cross does not have a winning record. Its been over 50 years since they made an appearance and where something like 5-13 in their conference. They won the Patriot so they are in. I believe the great Boston Celtic Bob Cousy played for Holy Cross.

Actually they were in the ncaa tourney in 47,48,50,53,56,77,80,94,01,02,03,07. Their last win was 1953.

[jackdaniel]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

I think the tourney is perfect right now. 64 teams.

The P5 schools that don't get in don't have a damn thing to b*tch about. Those teams are pry hovering about .500 in their conference. Sure they have a "marquee" win or two because they get the Oklahoma's, Duke's, UNC's, Indiana's, etc. to come to their place to play. There would be many mid-majors with the same wins if they had the luxury. They pad their records in the non-conference portion of the season with home wins because they can.

Awful lot of P5 teams with double digit losses this year. Syracuse, Wisconsin, Pitt, Oregon St. just to name a few.

I've noticed some teams (WBB) like Purdue,Minn, P-5 schools in general,hardly ever play on the road during their OOC part of their schedule too,got to give UConn and ND credit for playing anyone and agreeing to travel,as was the case with ND this year.I imagine they don't like those games to be close though.

Even though the P-5 teams in general would likely win most mid-major games,they don't schedule home and homes with them.That's nothing but cowardice in my opinion,not saying it's not smart,just saying it's spineless,and I have Zero respect for those programs that do this.I certainly am not sympathetic toward them that they can't get an at-large because they schedule nothing but cup cakes either,and then blame it on the red headed step child,the mid-majors,real class act there.

That said,that's the charm of the NCAA Tournament,and why people are drawn in and intrigued when little ole "who-the-hell -is- University" beats " Big-Bad A** U ".People get a kick out of that,I know I do.The tournament should hope and pray for Cinderella to make her appearance every year one would think,the bigger the upset,the better.If everything goes and reads like a script every year,it gets pretty boring to most casual fans who may tune in briefly once in awhile.

[Nidaros]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

I was going for sarcasm...

I can not do your thinking for you. You mentioned participation ribbons and everyone is already participating by being a conference member. That why I questioned what would change? I do agree with your mid major comment.

[jack power]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

Of the 351 teams, how many are without a conference? Dang few so what would be the change?

I was going for sarcasm...

[Nidaros]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

Holy Cross does not have a winning record. Its been over 50 years since they made an appearance and where something like 5-13 in their conference. They won the Patriot so they are in. I believe the great Boston Celtic Bob Cousy played for Holy Cross.

[MontanaRabbit]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

I think the tourney is perfect right now. 64 teams.

The P5 schools that don't get in don't have a damn thing to b*tch about. Those teams are pry hovering about .500 in their conference. Sure they have a "marquee" win or two because they get the Oklahoma's, Duke's, UNC's, Indiana's, etc. to come to their place to play. There would be many mid-majors with the same wins if they had the luxury. They pad their records in the non-conference portion of the season with home wins because they can.

Awful lot of P5 teams with double digit losses this year. Syracuse, Wisconsin, Pitt, Oregon St. just to name a few.

[Justwin]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

I think they should allow all 351 teams in, like high school. Then everybody gets a NCAA participation ribbon. It's simple....if mid-majors want their regular season championship have more value then don't get upset in your league tournament.

I agree completely! After all if we take the madness away from March madness we are just left with March.

[Nidaros]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

I think they should allow all 351 teams in, like high school. Then everybody gets a NCAA participation ribbon. It's simple....if mid-majors want their regular season championship have more value then don't get upset in your league tournament.

Of the 351 teams, how many are without a conference? Dang few so what would be the change?

[jack power]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

I think they should allow all 351 teams in, like high school. Then everybody gets a NCAA participation ribbon. It's simple....if mid-majors want their regular season championship have more value then don't get upset in your league tournament.

[filbert]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

Or we might watch how many P5 teams go down in this round and pare that many P5 schools out of next year.

Expand the tournament to 96 teams.

Conference regular season champions get automatic bids.
Conference tournament champions get automatic bids.

Committee seeds top 96 teams in country prior to conference tournaments. (Don't remember where I saw this seed-before-conference-tournament idea, but I like it a lot.)

(There is by happy coincidence exactly 32 D-I conferences right now. NCAA passes a rule to make it ever thus.)

Conference tournaments happen. Upsets occur. Unseeded teams knock out the bottom non-champion at-large teams (that don't win conference regular season or conference tournament) from the seed list.

Committee adds tournament champions not previously seeded to the bottom of the seed list.

First round played, the 64 non-regular-season winners--tournament upset champions and at-large teams. (This makes winning a conference regular season more valuable--gives regular season champion a first-round bye). Teams are seeded in order from the 96-team seed list (i.e. top seed plays bottom seed, etc.).

Second round matches a winner from the first round vs. a conference regular season champion. Games seeded as lowest seeded regular season champion plays winner of top first-round vs. bottom first-round game, etc..

[OldHare]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

on the Westwood 1 NCAA Selection Show Coach John Robinson suggested that Mid-Major one bid leagues drop their post season tournaments to prevent upsets that would keep the regular season champ out of the tournament.

Or we might watch how many P5 teams go down in this round and pare that many P5 schools out of next year.

[SturgisJeff]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

Some may find this interesting. USD's Kelly Stewart wrote a little article on how most mid-majors get snubbed when it comes to selection time for the NCAA tournament. She makes valid points and gives plenty of credit to SDSU. A link to a Jay Balis article is in her article which seems to be a really good idea imo.

http://www.swishappeal.com/2016/3/15...ajors#comments
Worth the read.

on the Westwood 1 NCAA Selection Show Coach John Robinson suggested that Mid-Major one bid leagues drop their post season tournaments to prevent upsets that would keep the regular season champ out of the tournament.

[Evolution Prime]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

I suspect that you and I have vastly different definitions of 'perfect' when it comes to the lake Poinset water conditions in August. I prefer to not look like the swamp thing when I get done swimming.

See, I knew someone would catch on.

[OldHare]

Re: Summit League Post-Season

Here is a post season article from Douple in the Macomb newspaper.
http://www.mcdonoughvoice.com/sports/20 ... mit-league