Re: Countdown to a Conference
Some other ideas to ponder--
First, Travel Distances.
Average air distance from Brookings to the nine Big Sky schools: 917.22 miles. Closest school: UNC, 483 air miles.
Average air distance from Brookings to the seven remaining Mid-Con schools: 635.14 miles. Closest school: UMKC, 363 air miles.
Average air distance from Brookings to the four GWFC schools: 967.75 miles. Closest school: NDSU, 180 air miles.
Item 1: Valparaiso just left the Mid-Con citing too much travel as the big reason.
Item 2: Travel is comparable right now between the Big Sky and the GWFC for SDSU.
Travel for all sports except football--Advantage: Mid-Con.
Let's look at the conference situation for "non-revenue" sports:
The Big Sky doesn't sponsor baseball, softball, swimming, wrestling, or equestrian. It does not sponsor a sport which SDSU doesn't have.
The Mid-Con doesn't sponsor football, wrestling, or equestrian. It sponsors men's soccer, which SDSU doesn't have. (As 89rabbit delights in noting in this and other forums, SDSU is already in the Mid-Con as an associate member in swimming and diving.)
I think the conclusion for the non-revenue sports is--Advantage: Mid-Con.
I know I'm beating the Mid-Con drum awfully hard--the truth is I'd be OK with SDSU in the Big Sky. I am just not at all sure that the Big Sky is, top to bottom, the better conference for SDSU. If we as an institution/alumni/fan base were as football-crazy as NDSU was, then I might see it the other way, but SDSU isn't the self-described football factory that NDSU perceives itself as. (Please, I don't mean to diminish those of you for whom football IS the priority--I'm just saying that football isn't as big at SDSU as it is at NDSU.)
Addressing the perception of which conference is better in basketball (read: men's basketball): Success among the non-major D-I conferences in basketball is cyclical, and really driven more by the success of individual teams than it is by a conference. You think Big Sky and you think Weber State and more recently Montana. You think Mid-Con and you think Valpo (oops!). The only non-major conference which has sustained success the past few years has been the Missouri Valley. We'll see if the Colonial can translate George Mason's success this year into an ongoing elevation in prestige.
The way is clearer in the Mid-Con for SDSU to regain some level of success in men's basketball than in the Big Sky. First, there are fewer teams, and second those teams are in (and known in) areas with greater population. That translates into somewhat easier recruiting. I still have to say advantage: Mid-Con here, as well.
Some other ideas to ponder--
First, Travel Distances.
Average air distance from Brookings to the nine Big Sky schools: 917.22 miles. Closest school: UNC, 483 air miles.
Average air distance from Brookings to the seven remaining Mid-Con schools: 635.14 miles. Closest school: UMKC, 363 air miles.
Average air distance from Brookings to the four GWFC schools: 967.75 miles. Closest school: NDSU, 180 air miles.
Item 1: Valparaiso just left the Mid-Con citing too much travel as the big reason.
Item 2: Travel is comparable right now between the Big Sky and the GWFC for SDSU.
Travel for all sports except football--Advantage: Mid-Con.
Let's look at the conference situation for "non-revenue" sports:
The Big Sky doesn't sponsor baseball, softball, swimming, wrestling, or equestrian. It does not sponsor a sport which SDSU doesn't have.
The Mid-Con doesn't sponsor football, wrestling, or equestrian. It sponsors men's soccer, which SDSU doesn't have. (As 89rabbit delights in noting in this and other forums, SDSU is already in the Mid-Con as an associate member in swimming and diving.)
I think the conclusion for the non-revenue sports is--Advantage: Mid-Con.
I know I'm beating the Mid-Con drum awfully hard--the truth is I'd be OK with SDSU in the Big Sky. I am just not at all sure that the Big Sky is, top to bottom, the better conference for SDSU. If we as an institution/alumni/fan base were as football-crazy as NDSU was, then I might see it the other way, but SDSU isn't the self-described football factory that NDSU perceives itself as. (Please, I don't mean to diminish those of you for whom football IS the priority--I'm just saying that football isn't as big at SDSU as it is at NDSU.)
Addressing the perception of which conference is better in basketball (read: men's basketball): Success among the non-major D-I conferences in basketball is cyclical, and really driven more by the success of individual teams than it is by a conference. You think Big Sky and you think Weber State and more recently Montana. You think Mid-Con and you think Valpo (oops!). The only non-major conference which has sustained success the past few years has been the Missouri Valley. We'll see if the Colonial can translate George Mason's success this year into an ongoing elevation in prestige.
The way is clearer in the Mid-Con for SDSU to regain some level of success in men's basketball than in the Big Sky. First, there are fewer teams, and second those teams are in (and known in) areas with greater population. That translates into somewhat easier recruiting. I still have to say advantage: Mid-Con here, as well.
Comment