First Weis, Now AJ?

[zooropa]

Re: First Weis, Now AJ?

Okay, so you're not on board, but it seems clear that others are!

Nobody that has posted on this thread is 'on board.'

We've all been either openly dismissive or sarcastically cooperative.

[ChampionAtRisk]

Re: First Weis, Now AJ?

Have you talked to these people personally?

I take the viewpoint that they do actually agree, for their posts seem to be supportive

[JackJD]

Re: First Weis, Now AJ?

Champ: you're wasting everyone's time. Each time you post, other posters see a new post on a thread so they check it out only to find a very poor attempt at humor. How about giving everyone a break and knocking it off? Thanks for your cooperation.

[zooropa]

Re: First Weis, Now AJ?

Have you talked to these people personally?

I take the viewpoint that they do actually agree, for their posts seem to be supportive

I hope your years at college do not rob you of your childlike innocence.

You don't want to end up a cranky and sarcastic grouch like myself.

BTownJack told you to leave and SoDakJack rejected your suggestion of Pam Borton by noting her failure to beat AJ the last two times they've played.

[ChampionAtRisk]

Re: First Weis, Now AJ?

We shall wait til tomorrow to see if the support of my viewpoint comes.

Also you guys have given no points as to why I am proposing a ludacris idea

[JackJD]

Re: First Weis, Now AJ?

Locking this one up and putting ChampionsAtRisk on a three-inch leash. (Added later: 7-day ban) (Added later still: permanently banned)