Deadspin - JackRabbits!

[zooropa]

Re: Deadspin - JackRabbits!

a good majority of those 167,000 would not have seen this article if not for deadspin.com.

OTOH: USA Today Circulation: 2.25M

[Rabbitden]

Re: Deadspin - JackRabbits!

I agree, the comments are over the line but don't blame this on RO for posting a link to a website. He didn't make the comments there.

I am sorry then, I took this in the wrong way considering it was posted under a quote from me.

[mango4]

Re: Deadspin - JackRabbits!

I am sorry then, I took this in the wrong way considering it was posted under a quote from me.

I see what you were saying. I hadn't meant to do that because you never called him out, it was just in general. sorry for the confusion

[KarmaKid]

Re: Deadspin - JackRabbits!

OTOH: USA Today Circulation: 2.25M

I think it's a different demographic for the most part that reads deadspin....I agree that quite a few of those probably do look at the USA Today; however, I think a lot of those that glance at deadspin probably don't read the USA Today also. Facts are 1. RO is not at fault here.... 2. Deadspin adds a little more exposure...

3. This thread should be done...

[NoVaJack]

Re: Deadspin - JackRabbits!

I think we're beating a dead horse here.

Think you meant Deadspin horse.
What we have seen on this post is the good, bad and ugly of the viral world. 'Nother vote for closure.