Re: Future
i have to respectfully disagree with the poster that mentioned the jacks don't need a pg to score 10 pts/game. i watched a handful of minnesota games this year and, wow, what a world of difference rachel banham has made for that team. now, i know it would be tough to get a pg of her caliber to sdsu---but, imagine what it would do for this team to have a pg that can take it to the basket and finish (banham can hit the 3, also). we've seen "flashes" of it, but, the consistency hasn't been there. things would open up so much more. to have that threat game in and game out would be huge. imo, would make everyone better.
i have to respectfully disagree with the poster that mentioned the jacks don't need a pg to score 10 pts/game. i watched a handful of minnesota games this year and, wow, what a world of difference rachel banham has made for that team. now, i know it would be tough to get a pg of her caliber to sdsu---but, imagine what it would do for this team to have a pg that can take it to the basket and finish (banham can hit the 3, also). we've seen "flashes" of it, but, the consistency hasn't been there. things would open up so much more. to have that threat game in and game out would be huge. imo, would make everyone better.
Comment