Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
UMKC in Brookings
Collapse
X
-
Re: UMKC in Brookings
Originally posted by NoVaJack View PostIs there kissing in basketball?
Comment
-
Re: UMKC in Brookings
Originally posted by filbert View PostWhat the heck, might as well go out and win all three on the road. If you're gonna break a streak, go ahead and break it good and hard!Grumbling along and embracing my role. If I didn't care, I wouldn't care. Go Jacks!
Comment
-
Re: UMKC in Brookings
Originally posted by Nidaros View PostI believe everyone on the team was old enough to vote in the last election. Also old enough to enter contracts. So why can't we refer to them as women? They are no longer juveniles. I sound picky, but they have reached majority for most things in life and have earned the right to be referred to as women. Ladies would be okay, but girls? nah unkind.
Totally agree with this. Boys and girls are high school teams.
Comment
-
Re: UMKC in Brookings
Originally posted by zooropa View PostI, OTOH, view 'girls' as the equivalent of 'guys' (seeings how 'dolls' is totally unacceptable).
So I consider calling the men's team the 'guys', as in 'if the guys can win one tonight....' to be equivalent to calling the women's team the 'girls'. It's an affectionate reference, not a negative reference.
It -is- true that 'girls' is also the equivalent of 'boys', however, I trust that context makes it quite clear that I respect these players as adults, and that I am not juvenalizing them.
This off topic, and to get back on I want a sweep of the men's remaining three games. It can be done.
Comment
-
Re: UMKC in Brookings
Originally posted by Nidaros View PostThe point is by law
For Karen: Did the team make you and your family special sweatshirts & such with both Griff and Garrett's numbers on them? Everyone else just gets the one sweatshirt with the one number on it.....
Comment
-
Re: UMKC in Brookings
Originally posted by zooropa View PostSorry. Not a lawyer, and I'm going to continue calling them 'girls' in the same way I call my 29 year old and 22 year old sisters 'girls', and for the same reason.
For Karen: Did the team make you and your family special sweatshirts & such with both Griff and Garrett's numbers on them? Everyone else just gets the one sweatshirt with the one number on it.....
Comment
-
Re: UMKC in Brookings
Originally posted by bbalggc View PostKai's girlfriend had them made for Kai and I had asked Kai's mom about them. I had both of the guys put on both shirts. We are equally proud of both of them and what they are accomplishing, as we are with all of our kids. It's a great investment!!!
The parents/family of the WBB team all have black sweatshirts with the numbers of 'their' player on them. I figured that was an athletic department thing. Maybe not.... If not, it should be.
Comment
-
Re: UMKC in Brookings
Originally posted by zooropa View PostHmmm.
The parents/family of the WBB team all have black sweatshirts with the numbers of 'their' player on them. I figured that was an athletic department thing. Maybe not.... If not, it should be.
Comment
-
Re: UMKC in Brookings
Originally posted by zooropa View PostHmmm.
The parents/family of the WBB team all have black sweatshirts with the numbers of 'their' player on them. I figured that was an athletic department thing. Maybe not.... If not, it should be.
EDIT: Oops BTown beat me to it. Dang phone interuptions.
You can't teach an old dog new tricks, but you can never teach a stupid dog anything.
Comment
-
Re: UMKC in Brookings
Originally posted by zooropa View PostSorry. Not a lawyer, and I'm going to continue calling them 'girls' in the same way I call my 29 year old and 22 year old sisters 'girls', and for the same reason.
Most newspapers agree with the AP stylebook which says that girl is acceptable until the age of 18 is reached. Then, young woman or woman is preferable. It's a matter of respect. Girl is a diminutive term, particularly when used by older people to refer to younger women.Holy nutmeg!
Comment
Comment