Originally posted by jacksfan29
View Post
because Creighton is the absolutely perfect situation for him. if you watch them on offense, it is like he never left brookings! also they have the same plan on rebounding, which continues to allow him to rack up boards. he is a good rebounder!!! i am NOT saying he is not!! but Kulkbrenner does the same thing that our posts do. put a body on the other teams big guys and keep them away from the rebound but going after the rebound themselves is not a priority!! they clear the bigs out and let the guards round up the ball. if baylor was beyond good as a rebounder he would get more O boards but he has never put up almost any!! Charley is a better offensive rebounder than baylor is
i am NOT trying to run Baylor down. he is a heck of a player and i wish he was still here and i am happy that he has had an excellent year in omaha!!! but that can be true while it is also true that he landed in a very very good spot for him with a coach who uses nearly identical schemes to what he has already played in for 3 years, and those schemes help to really highlight his strengths while doing a solid job of covering his weaknesses
Leave a comment: