Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jacks vs. Huskers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

    50 to 38 11;30 left. jacks just looking out of sync.
    LET'S TAKE A TRIP TO BIRDLAND! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68-6O2mJhMw

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

      steal and jam by Horstman, that was pretty awesome.
      LET'S TAKE A TRIP TO BIRDLAND! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68-6O2mJhMw

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

        Originally posted by 2002jack View Post
        steal and jam by Horstman, that was pretty awesome.
        another quick two by the Jacks, now down by 8. Let's go Rabbits!
        LET'S TAKE A TRIP TO BIRDLAND! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68-6O2mJhMw

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

          Originally posted by 2002jack View Post
          another quick two by the Jacks, now down by 8. Let's go Rabbits!

          Threee! by Callahan, Jacks down 5!

          Turnover Huskers!
          LET'S TAKE A TRIP TO BIRDLAND! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68-6O2mJhMw

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

            It stinks not having dyskstra. His skill set could really help if he was healthy......says capt obvious.
            "The most rewarding things you do in life, are often the ones that look like they cannot be done.” Arnold Palmer

            Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

              53 to 47 Huskers lead with 7:22 left. Jacks playing with some Defensive intensity, but can't seem to capitalize on the offensive end.
              LET'S TAKE A TRIP TO BIRDLAND! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68-6O2mJhMw

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

                Huskers are going to win this one. 70 to 58 with a 1:30 to play.

                Callahan makes a bunch of 3's and scores like 25, Wolters scores like 17, and the rest of the team 16. Not good. White, Fiegen, and Carlson did not show up to play.
                LET'S TAKE A TRIP TO BIRDLAND! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68-6O2mJhMw

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

                  Originally posted by 2002jack View Post
                  Huskers are going to win this one. 70 to 58 with a 1:30 to play.

                  Callahan makes a bunch of 3's and scores like 25, Wolters scores like 17, and the rest of the team 16. Not good. White, Fiegen, and Carlson did not show up to play.
                  13 of Wolters points are from the free throw line. He is 2 of 13 from the field

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

                    Not our best game.

                    I am not impressed by the Huskers big men. I thought Minnesota post players looked a lot better. However Nebraska's gaurds looked pretty good.
                    LET'S TAKE A TRIP TO BIRDLAND! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68-6O2mJhMw

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

                      Originally posted by 2002jack View Post
                      Huskers are going to win this one. 70 to 58 with a 1:30 to play.

                      Callahan makes a bunch of 3's and scores like 25, Wolters scores like 17, and the rest of the team 16. Not good. White, Fiegen, and Carlson did not show up to play.
                      How many short shots did Fiegen and Prince miss? Like always, sucks listening to homer announcers. Every move by Nate was a walk. Oh yeah, Hortsman is now a junior. REALLY!!! Idiots.
                      Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!--Bluto--

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

                        Watched most of the 2nd half.

                        Just didn't look like we were playing well. Played hard for a while there.

                        Thought our perimeter D was awful, got tired of watching them take us off the dribble.

                        On offense, we didn't get much except FT's for Nate, and 3's from Callahan. Looked totally out of synch out there.

                        Positives? Well, we played poorly, on the road, against a Big 12 opponent, and still cut the lead to five with about 7 mins left or so.

                        To be honest, the way we played... we'd have been beaten by 30 just a few short years ago. There's growth there.

                        Room for improvement? tons. We're better than what we showed today.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

                          Originally posted by bub94 View Post
                          How many short shots did Fiegen and Prince miss? Like always, sucks listening to homer announcers. Every move by Nate was a walk. Oh yeah, Hortsman is now a junior. REALLY!!! Idiots.
                          It really makes a difference having good announcers even if your team is losing. I hope other fsns can listen to our radio coverage and think we aren't complete homers.
                          "The most rewarding things you do in life, are often the ones that look like they cannot be done.” Arnold Palmer

                          Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

                            Chad White, please snap out of it. Thank You

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

                              Team played pretty bad as a whole, which is too bad because this one was a winnable game.

                              I continue to be impressed with the Jacks' first half defense and rebounding against these power conference opponents, though there seems to be more breakdowns in the second half. I believe the second half breakdown in these games have been attributed to the offense struggling, and the players start trying to compensate by creating offensive opportunities through steals and streaking down court before the rebound is secure.

                              Offense really has struggled in all our BCS games, and its mainly because the less experienced players are playing too passive on that side of the ball. Don't know if it's them playing overly cautious because of the name on the front of the defenders' jerseys, but they need to get the mindset that they are not only on their opponents' level, but better than they are (regardless of whether it is actually true).

                              Still positives to build on from this game, and hopefully this team continues to grow. The talent is there!
                              If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple of payments.
                              - Steven Wright

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Jacks vs. Huskers

                                Originally posted by da_coach View Post
                                Watched most of the 2nd half.

                                Just didn't look like we were playing well. Played hard for a while there.

                                Thought our perimeter D was awful, got tired of watching them take us off the dribble.

                                On offense, we didn't get much except FT's for Nate, and 3's from Callahan. Looked totally out of synch out there.

                                Positives? Well, we played poorly, on the road, against a Big 12 opponent, and still cut the lead to five with about 7 mins left or so.

                                To be honest, the way we played... we'd have been beaten by 30 just a few short years ago. There's growth there.

                                Room for improvement? tons. We're better than what we showed today.
                                Nate didn't shoot very well from the field but he was doubled teamed and trapped the whole game. Nebraska didn't even bother guarding anybody else.Grif was the only one to take advantage of the wide open looks.Brutal.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X