As I have been watching the NCAA tourney and the elite 8 (the only real one), I have been impressed by the talented players on the higher seeded teams and the scrapiness of the underdogs. However, I believe, the easy, shallow 3-point shot allows less capable teams to remain in games they have no business hanging around in.
Don't get me wrong I'm all for the underdog as will be one for a long time, but I like to see the most talented, well-balanced, properly coached teams play for the title. My point, the 3-point line needs to be extended to at least 21 feet, maybe further. Not to say current player can't hit a 21 footer (Bielien from 25'), but the sure won't shoot 50+ percent from 21 feet like the do now at 19'9". I enjoy the current 3 guard trend and spot up shooters, but I also like to see a motion offense utilizing all 5 positions including a strong inside game (like the eventual champion UNC has).
Time to back the 3-point line up, just my opinion. What do you guys think?
Don't get me wrong I'm all for the underdog as will be one for a long time, but I like to see the most talented, well-balanced, properly coached teams play for the title. My point, the 3-point line needs to be extended to at least 21 feet, maybe further. Not to say current player can't hit a 21 footer (Bielien from 25'), but the sure won't shoot 50+ percent from 21 feet like the do now at 19'9". I enjoy the current 3 guard trend and spot up shooters, but I also like to see a motion offense utilizing all 5 positions including a strong inside game (like the eventual champion UNC has).
Time to back the 3-point line up, just my opinion. What do you guys think?
Comment