The Argus Leader was full of articles yesterday about the execution and about Mr. Page. He commited a heinious crime, no doubt about it, but how he was raised as a child is a horrible story. I think most of the stories from yesterday's print verison are available for reading for those of you who live out of the area.
I am certainly not a proponent of the death penalty for the following reasons:
1. It does not bring the victims back to life.
2. Its not a deterent except for the person who committed crime and is subsequently put to death. You cant argue with the statement that" He/she will never kill again."
3. Its not workable with the current legal systems that allows an unlimited appeals which take years before the execution can take place. I dont think shortening the appeal process is a good idea either.
4. Those who are finally executed seem to have a very sad history of child rearing. The ones who commit these heinous crimes do not come from middle class and above income status, where the individuals have had a solid support system of two parents. Often these criminals grew up in a hostile home enviroment where there was no dad there to play catch with the football, baseball and to shoot hoops in the driveway.
5. I think life sentences without parole are probably a better judgement. The criminal is forced to live with their heinous behaviour for the rest of their lives. In Page's case he is already guilt ridden to the point that he wishes to die.
6. Most importantly, DNA testing has proven some people innocent after being properly tried and convicted. Again its about individual economic resouces and that abilty to obtain adequate legal counsel.
I was 6 years old when George Sitts was elecctricuted in 1947. All I remember is my older sister was reading the Argus shortly after the execution. I asked my sister what she was reading and she told me what happened, and this capital punishment happened too those bad people who killed people. Murder was a very thing bad and unforgiveable thing to commit. Not being able to read the newspaper at the time, George Sitts stayed in my mind and I could always answer the trivia question when capital punishment in SD came up. Yesterday in the Argus, Dave Kranz commented at length on the excution of George Sitts in 1947. It amazing that George too, was an orphan and never had much of support system.
If everyone was a great parent, I think we would not need the death penalty. Of course being a non-parent, its easy to say that.
I am certainly not a proponent of the death penalty for the following reasons:
1. It does not bring the victims back to life.
2. Its not a deterent except for the person who committed crime and is subsequently put to death. You cant argue with the statement that" He/she will never kill again."
3. Its not workable with the current legal systems that allows an unlimited appeals which take years before the execution can take place. I dont think shortening the appeal process is a good idea either.
4. Those who are finally executed seem to have a very sad history of child rearing. The ones who commit these heinous crimes do not come from middle class and above income status, where the individuals have had a solid support system of two parents. Often these criminals grew up in a hostile home enviroment where there was no dad there to play catch with the football, baseball and to shoot hoops in the driveway.
5. I think life sentences without parole are probably a better judgement. The criminal is forced to live with their heinous behaviour for the rest of their lives. In Page's case he is already guilt ridden to the point that he wishes to die.
6. Most importantly, DNA testing has proven some people innocent after being properly tried and convicted. Again its about individual economic resouces and that abilty to obtain adequate legal counsel.
I was 6 years old when George Sitts was elecctricuted in 1947. All I remember is my older sister was reading the Argus shortly after the execution. I asked my sister what she was reading and she told me what happened, and this capital punishment happened too those bad people who killed people. Murder was a very thing bad and unforgiveable thing to commit. Not being able to read the newspaper at the time, George Sitts stayed in my mind and I could always answer the trivia question when capital punishment in SD came up. Yesterday in the Argus, Dave Kranz commented at length on the excution of George Sitts in 1947. It amazing that George too, was an orphan and never had much of support system.
If everyone was a great parent, I think we would not need the death penalty. Of course being a non-parent, its easy to say that.
Comment