New Stu article speculation

[68 Jackrabbit]

Re: New Stu article speculation

If Stu isn't working on this story, then who is? Maybe an inside the athletic department pay back - past or present. Sounds interesting that some of the people posting on here have read the article.

Just a thought!

[JimmyJack]

Re: New Stu article speculation

I stand by my earlier comment. Unless somebody invents a mind-reading machine, we're just not going to know what happened here, and no story will be able to get to the bottom of it. And that's fine with me. It's old news as far as I'm concerned. What I really want is more information about the candidates currently being considered for the AD spot.

[SUPERBUNNY]

Re: New Stu article speculation

I stand by my earlier comment. Unless somebody invents a mind-reading machine, we're just not going to know what happened here, and no story will be able to get to the bottom of it. And that's fine with me. It's old news as far as I'm concerned. What I really want is more information about the candidates currently being considered for the AD spot.

We have a BINGO!

SUPERBUNNY

[bigticket1]

Re: New Stu article speculation

If Stu isn't working on this story, then who is? Maybe an inside the athletic department pay back - past or present. Sounds interesting that some of the people posting on here have read the article.

Just a thought!

I think the posts talking about having read the article were some posters trying to put some sarcasm/humor into all the speculation.

[AnimalHouse83]

Re: New Stu article speculation

FWIW ... I'm with JimmyJack and SUPERBUNNY. Until I actually see something in print, the story doesn't exist as far as I'm concerned.

[Nidaros]

Re: New Stu article speculation

I am beginning to think this thread should be retitled "RED HERRING", opps that could be a suggestion of ties to USD and I dont mean United States Dollars.

[RabbitObsessed]

Re: New Stu article speculation

Stu's gotta be loving this right now. He's got 2 pages full of comments about an article that hasn't even made it to print yet.

Now on page 6...

[MilwaukeeJacksAlum]

Re: New Stu article speculation

Cue the "Jaws" music . . .

Hey, don't shoot the messenger fellas. There's going to be an article and it ain't gonna be good.

[MilwaukeeJacksAlum]

Re: New Stu article speculation

And Stu's not writing it. Do the math on who is.

[JimmyJack]

Re: New Stu article speculation

I've heard the same stuff. It's not a red herring. They're trying to get at this story. That doesn't mean it'll happen, though. Most people have moved on and really aren't interested in this stuff. I'd suspect that TV is having a hard time finding anybody to talk to. In Terry's defense: It's his job to look into these things. He doesn't work for SDSU. His job is to investigate the good and the bad about SDSU athletics. I have often found it amusing on live chats when people thank TV for "promoting" SDSU athletics. That's not his job. He covers SDSU. Good and bad.

[1stRowFANatic]

Re: New Stu article speculation

And to his credit, TV corrects the caller/poster each time I've heard/seen it.

[bigticket1]

Re: New Stu article speculation

I've heard the same stuff. It's not a red herring. They're trying to get at this story. That doesn't mean it'll happen, though. Most people have moved on and really aren't interested in this stuff. I'd suspect that TV is having a hard time finding anybody to talk to. In Terry's defense: It's his job to look into these things. He doesn't work for SDSU. His job is to investigate the good and the bad about SDSU athletics. I have often found it amusing on live chats when people thank TV for "promoting" SDSU athletics. That's not his job. He covers SDSU. Good and bad.

I think you are right about people not wanting to go on the record for a negative article about someone who is no longer an employee.And,I don't think a "nameless source" kind of thing is going to see the light of day.

[Nidaros]

Re: New Stu article speculation

I've heard the same stuff. It's not a red herring. They're trying to get at this story. That doesn't mean it'll happen, though. Most people have moved on and really aren't interested in this stuff. I'd suspect that TV is having a hard time finding anybody to talk to. In Terry's defense: It's his job to look into these things. He doesn't work for SDSU. His job is to investigate the good and the bad about SDSU athletics. I have often found it amusing on live chats when people thank TV for "promoting" SDSU athletics. That's not his job. He covers SDSU. Good and bad.

I be the first to admit that my red herring mention was a bad attempt at humor, but I think the Argus either has a story or they don't. I dont think we have to make excuses for the Argus and their attempts to invent a story any more than we have to take the good reporting with the bad. I think its time for the Argus to fish or cut bait. If rumors can not be confirmed as fact then there is no story. Its irriating to not be in the rumor loop and to wait for the other shoe to drop with an Argus story.

[Nidaros]

Re: New Stu article speculation

I think you are right about people not wanting to go on the record for a negative article about someone who is no longer an employee.And,I don't think a "nameless source" kind of thing is going to see the light of day.

Of course they dont want to go on record as part of a negative article. It could lead to personal damages in a lawsuit, plus possible violations or rules and policies at SDSU, that could cost them their job. I believe this is what its all about. Does the Argus care if this happens to people? I think they only want their story and nothing else. This is one time I am glad Mr Vandervec or even Mr.Whitney can not find people to talk to.

[filbert]

Re: New Stu article speculation

And with that I think we bid a hearty farewell to this thread.

If and when something hits the fan, we'll pick it up from there.

Thread closed.