Re: Legislation Requiring SDSU to play USD getting filed
I'd like to try to give the Regents the benefit of the doubt here. The D1 thing was entirely new when they set the policy on using fees to fund athletics. To its credit, the administration at SDSU made it work without that option. I know it has been very difficult. In this case, USD may be able to help SDSU make the argument that the policy is short-sighted. The Regents have done a lot of things right in the last few years, from my perspective. Have they always done what I would want? No. But they have been very good advocates in the Legislature for the Regental institutions. I think if a strong case was made to the Regents, perhaps with SDSU and USD joining forces to make it, there is certainly a chance that the no fees policy could be adjusted.
I'd like to try to give the Regents the benefit of the doubt here. The D1 thing was entirely new when they set the policy on using fees to fund athletics. To its credit, the administration at SDSU made it work without that option. I know it has been very difficult. In this case, USD may be able to help SDSU make the argument that the policy is short-sighted. The Regents have done a lot of things right in the last few years, from my perspective. Have they always done what I would want? No. But they have been very good advocates in the Legislature for the Regental institutions. I think if a strong case was made to the Regents, perhaps with SDSU and USD joining forces to make it, there is certainly a chance that the no fees policy could be adjusted.
Comment