Over on the Bison discussion board there is a discussion on the relative sizes of Sioux Falls and Fargo. For some reason, I can't get logged in on their board but here are some links to official data that gives the answers.
For the federally defined metorpolitan areas for the two, Sioux Falls ranks 201 and Fargo 215 as of 2002. Sioux Falls Metro is about 10% bigger even including the Minnesota part of the Fargo metro.
http://www.proximityone.com/msa03us.htm
For rate of growth, the following graphic shows and the above table both show Sioux Falls metro growing much more rapidly
http://proximityone.com/images1/msapopchg0003.gif
I believe that the Fargo Metro had a larger population in 1990 but Sioux Falls passed Fargo before 2000 an the difference is getting bigger as shown by the tables.
For the federally defined metorpolitan areas for the two, Sioux Falls ranks 201 and Fargo 215 as of 2002. Sioux Falls Metro is about 10% bigger even including the Minnesota part of the Fargo metro.
http://www.proximityone.com/msa03us.htm
For rate of growth, the following graphic shows and the above table both show Sioux Falls metro growing much more rapidly
http://proximityone.com/images1/msapopchg0003.gif
I believe that the Fargo Metro had a larger population in 1990 but Sioux Falls passed Fargo before 2000 an the difference is getting bigger as shown by the tables.
Comment