Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bracketology

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Carolina010
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Originally posted by MontanaRabbit View Post
    We will have to shoot good to have a chance. I'm curious what the effect the added distance to the three pointed will have. I can't imagine it will help.
    I would bet you won’t see much of a difference. I would guess if you go back and look at where we shot most of it threes this year most of them came from a foot or more behind the line. So moving it back won’t change those threes at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • KUlawJack
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Originally posted by da_coach View Post
    Actually, I think it helps us. Texas is not known as a great shooting team.

    Whereas Daum and Jenkins can both hit from well outside the traditional 3 point line. It may affect Flatten and Ariens...which is concerning, but our 2 main "shooters" should be more than comfortable from that distance.

    Texas is crazy athletic... and the Jackrabbits will have to be prepared to handle the press. Haven't watched Texas alot this year, but I'm assuming Shaka is still pressing the whole game? (Havoc? I think he calls it?)
    They don't run the same havoc defense he was known for at VCU. They are very athletic, especially at the guard spots. Jaxson Hayes not playing is a big win for us as we have no one that can match up with him.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jacked_Up
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Originally posted by yoteforever View Post
    I watch Big 12 basketball 24/7. I have season tickets at Iowa State, that’s how I got to know TJ so well. Your starting 5 is every bit as good as Texas. Daum will be the best player on the floor. Jenkins 2nd best. After that advantage goes to Texas. This game is very winnable if you go in hungry and a chip on your shoulder. Texas doesn’t want to be there. I actually think the arena will be negative energy for the Longhorns. Many fans are done with the Shaka Smart era.

    Unless your guys go in not caring ( which I don’t see ) I think you pull off the upset. I’m not even certain it’s an upset. TJ is very familiar with Texas and will have additional access of tendencies from the Cyclone office. I’ll call it 86-82 Jacks
    Nice breakdown, Yoteforever. Thanks. This is a big opportunity for the Jacks against a team that might under-estimate them. Hopefully the Jacks get motivated and move on to the second round.

    Leave a comment:


  • goon
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Originally posted by da_coach View Post
    Actually, I think it helps us. Texas is not known as a great shooting team.

    Whereas Daum and Jenkins can both hit from well outside the traditional 3 point line. It may affect Flatten and Ariens...which is concerning, but our 2 main "shooters" should be more than comfortable from that distance.

    Texas is crazy athletic... and the Jackrabbits will have to be prepared to handle the press. Haven't watched Texas alot this year, but I'm assuming Shaka is still pressing the whole game? (Havoc? I think he calls it?)
    I was thinking that too. It helps spread our shooter out a little more. I would think flatten can handle it. Djj surely can.

    Leave a comment:


  • da_coach
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Originally posted by MontanaRabbit View Post
    We will have to shoot good to have a chance. I'm curious what the effect the added distance to the three pointed will have. I can't imagine it will help.
    Actually, I think it helps us. Texas is not known as a great shooting team.

    Whereas Daum and Jenkins can both hit from well outside the traditional 3 point line. It may affect Flatten and Ariens...which is concerning, but our 2 main "shooters" should be more than comfortable from that distance.

    Texas is crazy athletic... and the Jackrabbits will have to be prepared to handle the press. Haven't watched Texas alot this year, but I'm assuming Shaka is still pressing the whole game? (Havoc? I think he calls it?)

    Leave a comment:


  • BTownJack
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    I think them missing their stud freshman is a big turning point for us. Without him, I feel like we have a good chance of beating them. Let's do this!

    Leave a comment:


  • yoteforever
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    I watch Big 12 basketball 24/7. I have season tickets at Iowa State, that’s how I got to know TJ so well. Your starting 5 is every bit as good as Texas. Daum will be the best player on the floor. Jenkins 2nd best. After that advantage goes to Texas. This game is very winnable if you go in hungry and a chip on your shoulder. Texas doesn’t want to be there. I actually think the arena will be negative energy for the Longhorns. Many fans are done with the Shaka Smart era.

    Unless your guys go in not caring ( which I don’t see ) I think you pull off the upset. I’m not even certain it’s an upset. TJ is very familiar with Texas and will have additional access of tendencies from the Cyclone office. I’ll call it 86-82 Jacks

    Leave a comment:


  • MontanaRabbit
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Originally posted by Southeast View Post
    Ok, I’m on board now. A nationally televised game against a huge name in the world of college sports is a big opportunity. A lot of what happens in the first round of the NIT is dictated by the attitude of the teams that find themselves there. Hopefully ours comes in famished for retribution instead of licking their wounds.
    We will have to shoot good to have a chance. I'm curious what the effect the added distance to the three pointed will have. I can't imagine it will help.

    Leave a comment:


  • Southeast
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Ok, I’m on board now. A nationally televised game against a huge name in the world of college sports is a big opportunity. A lot of what happens in the first round of the NIT is dictated by the attitude of the teams that find themselves there. Hopefully ours comes in famished for retribution instead of licking their wounds.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nidaros
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Originally posted by LARabbit
    They still have three guys listed at 6-9.
    Oh boy

    Leave a comment:


  • LARabbit
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Texas looks to be an interesting team. They had like the 10th most difficult strength of schedule, but have gone .500 overall and 8-10 in conference. Still they have wins over North Carolina, Purdue, Kansas, Kansas state, and Iowa state. They also have loses against Radford, VCU, and Providence. Sounds like they will be without big 12 freshman of the year, 6’-11” Jaxson Hayes, who injured his knee in the final minutes of their last game. They still have three guys listed at 6-9.

    Leave a comment:


  • SoDakJack
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Originally posted by Carolina010 View Post
    at least we get ESPN instead of ESPN3 or ESPNU
    Anytime a mid-major can get their brand in front of new eyes it's a big deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • MontanaRabbit
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Some rule changes for the NIT. 3 point line is deeper among others.

    Leave a comment:


  • 98Jackfarmer
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Originally posted by bigticket1 View Post
    Hard to tell if the Longhorns really will want to keep playing - .500 record certainly is below expectations, especially with the $ they are paying Shaka Smart. In Texas, there may be more interest in spring football than playing in the NIT.

    I would quote the last two comments if I could. I think the boys know most all of SD is still behind them. I'm sure they are as disappointed as us. But, to know the state still cares A LOT should be a motivation. I think its called pride.

    Leave a comment:


  • jacks1
    replied
    Re: Bracketology

    Originally posted by bigticket1 View Post
    Hard to tell if the Longhorns really will want to keep playing - .500 record certainly is below expectations, especially with the $ they are paying Shaka Smart. In Texas, there may be more interest in spring football than playing in the NIT.
    By our Summit Tourney effort, I'd question the same for us...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X