Belmont

[filbert]

Re: Belmont

Nice win today. It was a fun game to watch. Cody Larsen was excellent. He battled hard down low and worked really hard on both ends. It was nice to beat a good team with Jordan making one FG.

On another note can anyone explain to me why the Rabbits have to go play in KC? Aren't the Rabbits the two time defending Summit League champions? Don't the Roos need this game more than SDSU? I just found it interesting ever since the schedule was posted.

Nice win today - GO RABBITS!

They're coming to KC so filbert doesn't have to go on the road to watch the Jacks! This seems obvious to me, anyway . . .

[LakeJack]

Re: Belmont

Home at last. The guys looked really good - so glad I got to see this one in person!

[RabbitObsessed]

Re: Belmont

^^Never seen somebody more arrogant

<3 <3

[SanDakotaState]

Re: Belmont

Nice win today. It was a fun game to watch. Cody Larsen was excellent. He battled hard down low and worked really hard on both ends. It was nice to beat a good team with Jordan making one FG.

On another note can anyone explain to me why the Rabbits have to go play in KC? Aren't the Rabbits the two time defending Summit League champions? Don't the Roos need this game more than SDSU? I just found it interesting ever since the schedule was posted.

Nice win today - GO RABBITS!

It was probably just a filler game for the Jacks so that they wouldn't be short on games. Its still a good road test. So far the games on the road have been very poor so if anything it can build confidence.

[slosho]

Re: Belmont

^^Never seen somebody more arrogant

U mad Bro?

[Nidaros]

Re: Belmont

They're coming to KC so filbert doesn't have to go on the road to watch the Jacks! This seems obvious to me, anyway . . .

Yeah its a haul to the frozen Dakotas, don't blame you. Also I re-track my comments about the Chicago market. Happy Holidays

[jack power]

Re: Belmont

Does anyone else think that rolling the ball in to keep the clock stopped should be subject to a 5 second inbounds rule?

The 5 second count stops once the ball leaves the inbounder's hands- not when it touches the court

[jacks1]

Re: Belmont

The 5 second count stops once the ball leaves the inbounder's hands- not when it touches the court

Everyone knows that...Boze was suggesting a change to the rule.

[Theee Catrabbit]

Re: Belmont

Good game! I think everyone can agree the Jacks weren't playing up to their potential. Bittle is definitely part of that potential. I think we also knew that it would take some time for them to gel without Nate on the floor. Good game!

[Jacked_Up]

Re: Belmont

Huge game for Carlson, too. He got the Jacks rolling, especially in the first half, and he handles the point well.

[jack power]

Re: Belmont

Everyone knows that...Boze was suggesting a change to the rule.

I misread his post.I suck!

[jack power]

Re: Belmont

Ladies and Gentleman, Jake Effing Bittle.

That is what the Jacks needed. Finally, a game that they can look at and say that is how we can be when we put it together.

The goal is the same and remains in front of these guys. Conference season is what it's all about. The tournament in Sioux Falls is the prize. Continue to improve play as a team.

Great win! In to the next!

SUPERBUNNY

+1 Having Bittle back changes the whole complexion of the team. He's tough on defense and attacks on offense. Fun to watch.

[bigticket1]

Re: Belmont

Does anyone else think that rolling the ball in to keep the clock stopped should be subject to a 5 second inbounds rule?

I have never agreed with that rule. Either the five count should continue until the ball is touched in-bounds , or the game clock should start when the ball touches the court in bounds.

[RabbitObsessed]

Re: Belmont

I have never agreed with that rule. Either the five count should continue until the ball is touched in-bounds , or the game clock should start when the ball touches the court in bounds.

I have to be honest, this is the first time I've ever seen anyone say they didn't like the rule. Starting the clock when the ball first touches a player's hands is consistent and fair. I don't see the problem with it.

[gojacksgo]

Re: Belmont

I have to be honest, this is the first time I've ever seen anyone say they didn't like the rule. Starting the clock when the ball first touches a player's hands is consistent and fair. I don't see the problem with it.

I agree with this. If defensive team wants the clock to start, they can deny the offense the chance to roll it.