Re: Baylor
Both Baylor and SDSU are coached by sons of coaches:
http://www.argusleader.com/article/2...nclick_check=1
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Baylor
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by bubbajack View PostGo Jacks!!!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by KUlawJack View PostIs there really though? Physical play is physical play. I understand the athletic ability of those teams, including Baylor, dwarfs ours at many positions, but I think Tony Fiegen is a pretty strong kid. He'll force those guys to muscle him around, he won't back down. Neither will Griff. That's the type of play to which I refer. I'm not asking them to be Thomas Robinson or Ricardo Ratliffe. Just to box out hard, hold their ground, and force Baylor to go through them to get baskets.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by SoDakJack View PostThere is a difference between SDSU playing physical and a team like Mizzou, Kansas, or K-State playing physical. The Jacks just need to go out, play their game, and let the chips fall where they may. Baylor isn't going to be intimidated by anything we do just like the Jacks won't be intimidated by anything Baylor does.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by KUlawJack View PostI agree with this. Indiana is average away from Assembly Hall. Baylor is an incredibly tough matchup. I'd rather play any of the other 3 seeds.
As one might imagine, I watch a ton of Big 12 basketball. We have to play physical from the get-go. Baylor has the tendency to shy away from physical play. If we play physical and can hit some shots to start the game, our chances improve dramatically.
I would think they play man from the start as well. They'd be out of their minds to play their soft zone against us.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by Just Glad To Be Here View Post
even though I think calling Scott Drew dirty is the single DUMBEST thing that I've ever heard on the internets, and that is saying something!!!!!!!!
:-)
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by bigticket1 View PostI would much rather play #4 Indiana,especially after their point guard blew his knee out over the week-end.
As one might imagine, I watch a ton of Big 12 basketball. We have to play physical from the get-go. Baylor has the tendency to shy away from physical play. If we play physical and can hit some shots to start the game, our chances improve dramatically.
I would think they play man from the start as well. They'd be out of their minds to play their soft zone against us.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by JackJD View PostGuys, we have a "smack" section. I strongly suggest the allegations about a crooked program are out of bounds in the Jackrabbit Men's Basketball section. No one has ever come up with any shred of evidence of problems in the program since Coach Drew took over. As a result, we have one of those "did too," "did not" "did too" "did not" things going on.
Back to decaf for some of you.
even though I think calling Scott Drew dirty is the single DUMBEST thing that I've ever heard on the internets, and that is saying something!!!!!!!!
:-)
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by bigticket1 View PostI would much rather play #4 Indiana,especially after their point guard blew his knee out over the week-end.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by jackmd View PostWanting to make you work a little bit. In your opinion what teams would pose a better match-up at the 3 or 4 seed? Not challenging you just looking for your opinion. I think there are several other teams that would be more difficult for the Jacks to match-up with.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Guys, we have a "smack" section. I strongly suggest the allegations about a crooked program are out of bounds in the Jackrabbit Men's Basketball section. No one has ever come up with any shred of evidence of problems in the program since Coach Drew took over. As a result, we have one of those "did too," "did not" "did too" "did not" things going on.
Back to decaf for some of you.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by Baylor1960 View PostIs this stupidity typical for your forum? I've been nice the few times I've posted, but this, this is just stupidity.
I think it just shows passion of the fanbases. When you get really passionate sometimes logic goes out the window, then the stupidity flows like.......
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Baylor
Originally posted by Baylor1960 View PostPerry turned down the NBA to play at Baylor. Yes, all signs point to bringing up questions because a college player might stay in college rather than PLAYING IN THE NBA FOR MILLIONS.
And calling Baylor dirty AFTER 2003? Holy hell man, our program got gutted. Scott Drew, the nice guy of Valpo was going to come here and start cheating? Sheesh. Lot of stupid here, sorry to litter your board with my rant guys.
Is this stupidity typical for your forum? I've been nice the few times I've posted, but this, this is just stupidity.
Baylor is part of big time college athletics, so in some people's mind its guilt by association. Throw in some pretty interesting happenings in the last decade at YOUR school, and it isn't that far of a stretch for people to make off hand comments.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: