Originally posted by zooropa
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GDT: SDSU v SIU
Collapse
X
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
Originally posted by zooropa View PostThey run the same offense, regardless of who's playing QB.
I haven't the foggiest idea why 'ball control' strategy is so hard for some people to understand.
Its seems like there is only 1 read when Crawford is in there....
you can say what you want about which QB is better but from watching the game it just seems like the offense is more dimensional and a step faster when O'Brien is in there....
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
Originally posted by JimmyJack View PostSure. What are you going to give up to take McIntosh's running away? It's still 11 on 11. The guy made some plays with his feet. And he threw some decent balls, too. Good players make plays, and he's tough to defend.
There are options: the most popular is to have a LB or safety 'spy' the QB: stay in the defensive backfield just short of the line, not engaging a lineman/blocking back after the snap.
It requires trusting your defensive backs to hold the receivers long enough for the D-line and the other linebackers to collapse the pocket (given enough time, the pocket -always- collapses). Once that happens your 'spy' is in front of the QB, not behind him, which gives him an advantage in stopping him.
You will either sacrifice some pressure on the line (most often) or in the backfield but, as I said, if you can trust the rest of your unit to perform, you've got a man in front of the QB waiting for him, instead of behind him, trying to run him down.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
What I did not like was the defense setting up, SIU coming to the line, seeing the defensive set, looking at their coaches and calling the play. The d taking a chance should not get set until the last second possible not giving the o a chance to see what they are up against. Or else change the d coverage after the call comes in for the o. It looked like the Jacks just sat in the same defensive formation even after the offense got the new call. Iowa State did the same thing last year and killed us.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
Originally posted by zooropa View PostMaybe. Put him up against a defense that will take away those scrambling opportunities and he looks decidedly like a second stringer.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
Originally posted by bigticket1 View PostCrawford is not as mobile ,which I believe is partly due to his knee not being 100 % yet. Last week it was really obvious when he tried to run - not as noticable today,but I still think he is not back to full strenghth yet.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
Originally posted by SD-STATE View PostI believe SIU's QB was probably more athletic and quicker than anyone we had on the field defensively.
Nobody could get released until McIntosh had five or six yards. The guy on McIntosh would be behind him, and couldn't get enough of a grip on him to bring him down, and there'd be no one in front of him.
And that's been a problem for the Jacks for a little while now, and I wish they'd do something about it.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
Originally posted by joeboo22 View Postguys.... Was the loss solely Crawfords fault? No but the offense was very staget when he was in there, 1 one big play was a so so short pass and a broken tackle....
The problem I had with Crawford, was his foot work was horrible, when he was passing he looked at one reciever and then sat there.... a couple of those sacks he just sat there or stepped into the line....
The offense seems to run a lot smoother with TOB in there, the outs are not jumped because 1st he has a strong enough arm to get it there and 2 they have respect for the deep ball on the pump fake....
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
Originally posted by bub94 View Postand then a poor snap/catch on the punt?
That was just, I mean, when you've got something that blows up in your face, and then blows up in your face again, and then the guy trying to minimize the damage can't even do that.............. Yeaaaaiiikes.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
Originally posted by joeboo22 View Postguys.... Was the loss solely Crawfords fault? No but the offense was very staget when he was in there, 1 one big play was a so so short pass and a broken tackle....
The problem I had with Crawford, was his foot work was horrible, when he was passing he looked at one reciever and then sat there.... a couple of those sacks he just sat there or stepped into the line....
The offense seems to run a lot smoother with TOB in there, the outs are not jumped because 1st he has a strong enough arm to get it there and 2 they have respect for the deep ball on the pump fake....
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
Originally posted by zooropa View PostMaybe. Put him up against a defense that will take away those scrambling opportunities and he looks decidedly like a second stringer.
His ability played right into the Jacks' weakness. Hopefully they can bring in someone, somehow, or study some film, or read some books, or do something to keep broken plays from turning into first downs.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
guys.... Was the loss solely Crawfords fault? No but the offense was very staget when he was in there, 1 one big play was a so so short pass and a broken tackle....
The problem I had with Crawford, was his foot work was horrible, when he was passing he looked at one reciever and then sat there.... a couple of those sacks he just sat there or stepped into the line....
The offense seems to run a lot smoother with TOB in there, the outs are not jumped because 1st he has a strong enough arm to get it there and 2 they have respect for the deep ball on the pump fake....
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
I'm gonna borrow a line just for laughs. SIU didn't beat us, we beat ourselves. They didn't do anything we didn't expect them to do. :-)
So on a serious part, SDSU did do a lot wrong in this game they didn't do against UNI. What was up with the poor snap in shotgun and then a poor snap/catch on the punt? Wow, what a killer possesion. That was at least 30 yards taken backwards in 2 plays by poor execution. Gimme touchdown for SIU. I also agree with the post in regards to someone finally jumping our 'outs'. It just didn't look like they were comfortable with throwing deep with Crawford today and were settling for 5 yard passes.
On the comments regarding the cheers for Thomas. I really thought the QB change would be made at halftime. And I'm not throwing blame on Crawford. I was all for him being the starter after coming back from his injury. I just would have start the second half with Thomas.
Something just wasn't clicking today. Some was play calling. Minett was able to run and get yards. First down run for 5 yards, then just straight to pass for the next 2 downs. He could have run the ball all day but we went away from it. What about the tackling? This was the worst tackling I have seen in a long time. It wasn't a very good display of wrapping up the ballcarrier. I have enjoyed the past 4-5 years with these seniors and wish this wasn't the result of their senior day.
Can you really rough the passer when the passer is a running back sweeping out to the sidelines? Who knew. Hope they get pissed about how the game went and take it out on Minnesota next week.
SIU was a very good team. This game should have been a lot closer.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: SDSU v SIU
Originally posted by SF_Rabbit_Fan View PostFans are most definitely allowed to complain. That's not what I'm saying at all.
These people did not "generally have a good attitude." I guess I was kind of thinking to myself, if you don't enjoy the games, why do you show up. These were the types of fans who would complain loudly if we were up 27-3. And there seemed to be a lot of them in my general vicinity.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: