Re: Developing the football fan base
JimmyJack said: "The internal culture of SDSU is very toxic right now. You can't offer ideas without having somebody come down on you. So... everybody just clams up. We need some leadership to solve that"
propar80 responded: "WOW, I had no idea there was such infighting between administrative groups. Sounds like a bunch of 2nd graders fighting over the teatherball court.
I guess the President has some work to do...and maybe some firing."
I disagree with JimmyJack's comment. (I defend his right to offer such opinions on the message board...I do not share his opinion.) Toxic? Sheesh...a little strong! In any large institution, a certain amount of turf-protection normally occurs. Tugs-of-war are always going on. I guess in my profession I'm accustomed to people being 'devil's advocate' and constantly challenging one's ideas. That's progress. Vigorous debate is healthy. I think most will agree SDSU has far exceeded expectations for the past five years and that would not have occurred and would not continue in a 'toxic' atmosphere.
Pushing a large institution of any nature, is difficult work. There will even be casualties once in a while. People get upset. (I've had conversations with some!) So, look to some of the objective signs to see if progress is being made. I think SDSU's growth, its student retention, the type of students it is attracting (cf. grade points and ACT/SAT scores of incoming student to other schools in SD and in the region and to SDSU in past years), the academic performance of its athletes...well, the list goes on. There's simply too much evidence that right things are happening.
I agree with filbert's comment about the starting point: It takes money. I think the fan base grows with the "Wow" factor as was said earlier.
JimmyJack said: "The internal culture of SDSU is very toxic right now. You can't offer ideas without having somebody come down on you. So... everybody just clams up. We need some leadership to solve that"
propar80 responded: "WOW, I had no idea there was such infighting between administrative groups. Sounds like a bunch of 2nd graders fighting over the teatherball court.
I guess the President has some work to do...and maybe some firing."
I disagree with JimmyJack's comment. (I defend his right to offer such opinions on the message board...I do not share his opinion.) Toxic? Sheesh...a little strong! In any large institution, a certain amount of turf-protection normally occurs. Tugs-of-war are always going on. I guess in my profession I'm accustomed to people being 'devil's advocate' and constantly challenging one's ideas. That's progress. Vigorous debate is healthy. I think most will agree SDSU has far exceeded expectations for the past five years and that would not have occurred and would not continue in a 'toxic' atmosphere.
Pushing a large institution of any nature, is difficult work. There will even be casualties once in a while. People get upset. (I've had conversations with some!) So, look to some of the objective signs to see if progress is being made. I think SDSU's growth, its student retention, the type of students it is attracting (cf. grade points and ACT/SAT scores of incoming student to other schools in SD and in the region and to SDSU in past years), the academic performance of its athletes...well, the list goes on. There's simply too much evidence that right things are happening.
I agree with filbert's comment about the starting point: It takes money. I think the fan base grows with the "Wow" factor as was said earlier.
Comment