Re: Update on SDSU and D1AA Move.
The status on Sac-State and Portland State and their future in the Big Sky is one of contention, and may explain the 4-4 vote regarding SDSU and NDSU. Portland as the article posted over on Bisonville explains was to play basketball in the Rose Garden, which is a grand facility for the Trailblazers and that failed. It failed miserably and that is why they are back on campus with their 1500 capcity facility.
Sac State orginally had a minor football franchise using their facility and upgraded some of the seating and other things for Sac State. The Franchise moved on and now they are left holding the bag and in fact some of the football seating was removed. Since the franchised left their attendence has not been much better than SDSU. Add to that coaching staff had numerous problems and they fired their coach. The new guy is suppose to turn things around. Sounds familiar.
They have a new president and the AD is Terry Wanless who was a finalist for the AD at SDSU but later got the job at UND. He made some moves up at UND including removing the Sioux Logo that got him fired. I dont think he got on good with Ralph Englestad the guy with the dough, and he and the president at UND both got their walking papers.
Wanless has not been any help to NDSU and SDSU in getting into the Big Sky. In fact he is the biggest opponent. He has had a voice in this matter since, Sac State just recently hired a president. Terry seems to forget where he came from, namely Mission South Dakota.
So yes this is an interesting part of equation, and the big city media market looked different to the Montana schools in 1995 than what it does now. Not that great by any means.
The status on Sac-State and Portland State and their future in the Big Sky is one of contention, and may explain the 4-4 vote regarding SDSU and NDSU. Portland as the article posted over on Bisonville explains was to play basketball in the Rose Garden, which is a grand facility for the Trailblazers and that failed. It failed miserably and that is why they are back on campus with their 1500 capcity facility.
Sac State orginally had a minor football franchise using their facility and upgraded some of the seating and other things for Sac State. The Franchise moved on and now they are left holding the bag and in fact some of the football seating was removed. Since the franchised left their attendence has not been much better than SDSU. Add to that coaching staff had numerous problems and they fired their coach. The new guy is suppose to turn things around. Sounds familiar.
They have a new president and the AD is Terry Wanless who was a finalist for the AD at SDSU but later got the job at UND. He made some moves up at UND including removing the Sioux Logo that got him fired. I dont think he got on good with Ralph Englestad the guy with the dough, and he and the president at UND both got their walking papers.
Wanless has not been any help to NDSU and SDSU in getting into the Big Sky. In fact he is the biggest opponent. He has had a voice in this matter since, Sac State just recently hired a president. Terry seems to forget where he came from, namely Mission South Dakota.
So yes this is an interesting part of equation, and the big city media market looked different to the Montana schools in 1995 than what it does now. Not that great by any means.
Comment