Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Spring Game

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hareofthedog
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Gophers will cover whatever the spread and be a much improved team. Defenses will stop the run and make the inexperienced QB win the game for the Jacks this season. 8-4 would be a great season for the team but it could be worse.

    Leave a comment:


  • SDSUAlum08
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by Mr_Tibbs View Post
    Understandable. My point was that on paper, 2014 Mizzou, 2016 TCU, 2010 and 2013 UNL were all better than what Minnesota is anticipated to be this year. Those were all games (with the exception of UNL in 2013) that SDSU was still within striking distance in the fourth quarter. While 2019 Minnesota is talented, I don't believe they are better than some of the above mentioned teams that SDSU competed well with in the past.
    Yeah you’re probably right on that. I looked up Mizzou and they went 11-3. TCU went 6-7. Nebraska had decent seasons.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr_Tibbs
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by SDSUAlum08 View Post
    Ill be surprised if SDSU is within 20pts. Gophers will have playmakers all over the field on offense and an improved defense. Just my opinion.
    Understandable. My point was that on paper, 2014 Mizzou, 2016 TCU, 2010 and 2013 UNL were all better than what Minnesota is anticipated to be this year. Those were all games (with the exception of UNL in 2013) that SDSU was still within striking distance in the fourth quarter. While 2019 Minnesota is talented, I don't believe they are better than some of the above mentioned teams that SDSU competed well with in the past.

    Leave a comment:


  • CappinHard
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by SDSUAlum08 View Post
    Ill be surprised if SDSU is within 20pts. Gophers will have playmakers all over the field on offense and an improved defense. Just my opinion.
    If I had to venture a guess, I would say we'll be 16.5 point underdogs. We'll know in about a month.

    Leave a comment:


  • SDSUAlum08
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by Mr_Tibbs View Post
    That's not saying much, haha. But I agree, UM will be better than they've been in a while. However, I don't think I'd put the 2019 gopher's in the top 3rd of strength of FBS games we've played. Mizzou in 14, UNL in 13, UNL in 10, and even TCU in 16 were all better than what I believe this year's gophers team will bring to the table. While they did play better to end the season, I'll believe it when I see it for them being a competitive team in the Big 10 West. With that being said, I'd see till be surprised of we go in there and get a W. While TCF Bank isn't a notoriously tough venue to get a win, it's still a Thursday night home opener in a Big 10 stadium at the point in the season while UM fans are still optimistic and haven't thrown in the towell yet. It'll be tough, but it's as winnable of an FBS game as we've had in a few years, KU in 2015 notwithstanding.
    Ill be surprised if SDSU is within 20pts. Gophers will have playmakers all over the field on offense and an improved defense. Just my opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakejc795
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by Mr_Tibbs View Post
    Not really I guess. YSU was pretty competitive with us last year, and it's an early conference game on the road. YSU is usually playing their best football in the first half of the season, and we had fits there in 2017. It just feels like one of our "dud" games. When you figure we'll drop one on the road mid-season that we shouldn't, YSU or ISUB are the best candidates, and I think YSU will be tougher next year.
    I'm cautiously optimistic. They'll have new QB and RB and three new OL on offense; "green" defenders at all three levels (including MLB); and completely new special teams trio.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr_Tibbs
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by jakejc795 View Post
    Interesting predictions, particularly the loss at YSU.

    Just curious, if Jacks upset Gophers, and don't sustain injuries prior to game against 'Guins, would that leave you more confident? Looks like the Gophers are relatively young on both lines and at LB (although one of their more "experienced" LBs is R-Jr. Bailey Schoenfelder from Huron), which could bode well for Jacks RBs. In addition, if Tanner Morgan is their QB, he seems like more a traditional pocket passer, which could leave them susceptible to blitz. However, another source cites his quick release, so loss of Jordan Brown could hurt Jacks in coverage.
    Not really I guess. YSU was pretty competitive with us last year, and it's an early conference game on the road. YSU is usually playing their best football in the first half of the season, and we had fits there in 2017. It just feels like one of our "dud" games. When you figure we'll drop one on the road mid-season that we shouldn't, YSU or ISUB are the best candidates, and I think YSU will be tougher next year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr_Tibbs
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by SDSUAlum08 View Post
    SDSU will be facing one of the better Gopher teams in years. The Gophers changed DC’s halfway through the season and they started playing very well.
    That's not saying much, haha. But I agree, UM will be better than they've been in a while. However, I don't think I'd put the 2019 gopher's in the top 3rd of strength of FBS games we've played. Mizzou in 14, UNL in 13, UNL in 10, and even TCU in 16 were all better than what I believe this year's gophers team will bring to the table. While they did play better to end the season, I'll believe it when I see it for them being a competitive team in the Big 10 West. With that being said, I'd see till be surprised of we go in there and get a W. While TCF Bank isn't a notoriously tough venue to get a win, it's still a Thursday night home opener in a Big 10 stadium at the point in the season while UM fans are still optimistic and haven't thrown in the towell yet. It'll be tough, but it's as winnable of an FBS game as we've had in a few years, KU in 2015 notwithstanding.

    Leave a comment:


  • SDSUAlum08
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    SDSU will be facing one of the better Gopher teams in years. The Gophers changed DC’s halfway through the season and they started playing very well.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakejc795
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by Mr_Tibbs View Post
    Agreed. One way or the other, I believe Gibbs will be our QB of the future. Whether that starts in August of 2019 or not, who knows. But he made some good decisions today, and that bodes well for him this fall.

    It's too early to really evaluate one way or the other, but given our schedule, I think we've got the tools in place to make an 8th straight playoff appearance, despite the leadership we lost to graduation. As I see it (Way too early predictions, but it's April and I don't care):

    @UM - Winnable game, but a Thursday night game in a Big 10 stadium isn't the ideal place for a new QB to start. Being conservative, I'll call this an L

    LIU - Good former D2, but should be a W

    @Drake - Should be a W

    SUU - Birds had a bad season last year, but I'm not sure what they return. Being at home, this should be a W

    SIU - At home, I think we can grind this one out. W

    @YSU - My gut tells me L

    @ISUB - Not sure what they return, but their QB is gone (I think). Should have been a playoff team last year. I think we pull out a W

    NDSU - NDSU lost a LOT of seniors off that team, and while they probably will reload, it wouldn't shock me if they're not a top 5 team next season. Top 15 for sure, but I could see them losing 2+ games in the regular season. Since it's April and there's no reason for pessimism right now, let's say a W.

    @MSU - Bears don't play well late in the year. W

    ISUR - Tough team to predict. They've fallen apart late in the year the last few years, but they always play us tough. They were a young team last year, and I could see a L here.

    UNI - This feels like a revenge game to me and I think we'll take it.

    @USD - I'm not going to predict a USD victory here, but this is probably the best shot they've had yet in the D1 era to take us down. New QB playing in the Dome and they always play us close down there. With that being said, they'll be short a few thousand fans for this one compared to normal and they just weren't very good last year. Not sure how much they return on the O line and on D, but those were pretty weak units for them last year, and I doubt they've fixed all the issues. W

    I think 9-3 is real doable, and 8-4 is definitely attainable. Toughest road games are @UM, @YSU, and @USD

    NDSU, ISUR, and UNI at home. It's a favorable schedule for a team with a new QB and coordinators.
    Interesting predictions, particularly the loss at YSU.

    Just curious, if Jacks upset Gophers, and don't sustain injuries prior to game against 'Guins, would that leave you more confident? Looks like the Gophers are relatively young on both lines and at LB (although one of their more "experienced" LBs is R-Jr. Bailey Schoenfelder from Huron), which could bode well for Jacks RBs. In addition, if Tanner Morgan is their QB, he seems like more a traditional pocket passer, which could leave them susceptible to blitz. However, another source cites his quick release, so loss of Jordan Brown could hurt Jacks in coverage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nidaros
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by Mr_Tibbs View Post
    Stig just went on record saying we'll see more blitzing this fall. He "was too harsh with Brown on allowing blitzes, but he wants to open it up more for the new D Coordinators". If true, that's the best news of the day.
    Very interesting! Some of you guys were on to something a while back. Stig can be adamant in some of his point of views. This was one of them.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackdaniel
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by Kemo View Post
    I got home from work in time to see most of the 2nd half. My take away from the QB situation was that Gibbs is a "grown man." There is just such a noticeable difference in size and mass when he's out there compared to Walding and especially Connors (didn't see Nelson at all in the 2nd half... not sure if he played in the 1st or not). That said, I really like what Connors did out there. Really poised and threw some nice balls, but he needs to dedicate himself to the weight room and the training table, as his frame is still too slight.

    If I had to put money on it, I'd say Gibbs will likely be the starter out of fall camp since he appears to be catching up with the mental part of the game and he's such a physical specimen.
    I thought Connors (the guy from Tenn) really threw the ball pretty well in the clip of the QB's throwing in practice a while back.I didn't want to mention it then until someone else mentioned him.He seems like a good passer, nice looking ball he throws, seems to throw accurately.Gibbs seems to be the consensus front runner however, for starting.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackdaniel
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    Originally posted by Kemo View Post
    My ears perked up as well when I heard this. Hope this leads to a less predictable defense for the upcoming season.
    Blitzing ,less face it, is anti-conservative,there's a risk associated with it, Stig used to be very consevative with the play calling, the trouble with that is teams can more easily figure out schemes to use against a defense that doesn't vary all that much. I guess " predictable" is a good word to describe how it becomes , as noted. Even though allowing more blitzes would seem more risky, it's my belief that it's about 50/50 in success rate, as long as the negative 50% doesn't end up being a lot of crazy long gains or quick TD's, the overall objective of being less predictable is a net gain for me. I'm sure they can come up with some sort of compromise that allows more risk, for the bigger objective of becoming less predictable, maybe lessening that risk to an acceptable level both sides can live with. It would make the game more interesting for sure, hopefully in a positive way,from our perspective.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jacked_Up
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    A few other random observations from the spring game:
    - The offense won 47-37 (or something like that).
    - Lots of first stringers were nursing injuries and didn't play. That might have hurt the defense more than the offense.
    - The RBs looked strong. There's probably going to be a lot of competition at receiver.
    - Good crowd (but quiet). The bleachers were about full.
    Last edited by Jacked_Up; 04-14-2019, 08:47 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jacked_Up
    replied
    Re: Spring Game

    I guess I saw the QB competition at the spring game differently. Matt Connors, the redshirt freshmen, was impressive, perhaps because I didn't know much about him or what to expect. Kurt Walding started for the offensive, generally played well and, I'm guessing, is most likely to start the first game next fall. J'Bore Gibbs is the most physically impressive and could be great eventually. But he and Kanin Nelson each missed some mid-range passes badly. Walding is poised, throws a pretty good ball and seems least likely to turn the ball over in pressure situations. Nelson took a hard hit in the upper leg area in the first half, and I don't recall him playing again after that. I hope he didn't get injured.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X