Originally posted by SDSUAlum08
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Collapse
X
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
UNI has some very good athletes but their style of play makes them look a little undisciplined. I heard one comparison that seemed to sum it up: UNI's football team this year is a little like a basketball team that is full of Jucos...sometimes its difficult to get them to play together even though the individual players can be good athletes.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Originally posted by boxerboy View PostI don't mean any disrespect or anything, and I know many of you will rip me and disagree too. I just am not a fan of Tyler Merriman's, (sp) play by play announcing. I will admit that it is primarily a matter of taste. His voice is too high-pitched for my liking but I do think his play-by-play could be much improved also. However, living quite a ways away, I only listen to him on the highlights of Jackrabbit football. That being said the football team I couldn't be prouder of.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Originally posted by boxerboy View PostI don't mean any disrespect or anything, and I know many of you will rip me and disagree too. I just am not a fan of Tyler Merriman's, (sp) play by play announcing. I will admit that it is primarily a matter of taste. His voice is too high-pitched for my liking but I do think his play-by-play could be much improved also. However, living quite a ways away, I only listen to him on the highlights of Jackrabbit football. That being said the football team I couldn't be prouder of.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Originally posted by MontanaRabbit View PostTwo of our 3 losses could be to FCS teams that wont make the playoffs. Our FCS loss doesnt look great since TCU is currently .500. The committee could easily not give us a seed.
We win vs Poly or ISUr and we are seeded. We dropped both so we are firmly on the bubble.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Originally posted by RowdyRabbit View PostHighlights are out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJuecFoAC6g
On the int to salt the game, poor old #74 for UNI (6:05 mark)...gotta hand it to that kid, he gave it his absolute all to try to catch Soulek...almost wish he'da caught him!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Jacks are at #4 in the Sagarin and #5 in the Massey ratings, both updated after yesterday's games.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
I understand not being optimistic about a seed to avoid being disappointed, but aren't UCA and Richmond in exactly the same situation as the Jacks were a year ago ? The Jacks were widely considered to be somewhere in the 6 to 8 seed range, and got dropped after losing in Macomb. And that was in overtime to a playoff team. Both Richmond and UCA got hammered yesterday, one to a .500 team. If the committee shows any kind of consistency, both the Jacks and UND should jump those teams.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Originally posted by RowdyRabbit View PostNo, I'm talking #74, bottom of the screen.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Originally posted by MontanaRabbit View PostI think it was #75 but yeah that's all effort there. Game was over. I've got respect for him.
Soulek was absolutely gassed after that!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Originally posted by RowdyRabbit View PostHighlights are out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJuecFoAC6g
On the int to salt the game, poor old #74 for UNI (6:05 mark)...gotta hand it to that kid, he gave it his absolute all to try to catch Soulek...almost wish he'da caught him!
Soulek was absolutely gassed after that!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Originally posted by RowdyRabbit View PostI can easily see the committee not putting SDSU ahead of UCA solely based on record (9-2 vs 8-3). Even with their FBS win, you and I know that's vs a drastically worse schedule. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the committee doesn't see it that way. Even with the schmucking UCA took today, it was vs a higher ranked team, and I can see them not dropping them due to that.
I can easily see the committee not putting SDSU ahead of Richmond as well. Same record, again, even with their FBS win, vs a lighter schedule. Because East Coast bias.
Add in that would mean UND would probably leap both as well, and that'd mean 3 Dakota teams seeded? Yeah, I can easily easily see them not seeding SDSU.
I'll sit and wait and expect to not be seeded and be very happy if I'm wrong, rather than be pissed that I was right.
We win vs Poly or ISUr and we are seeded. We dropped both so we are firmly on the bubble.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Highlights are out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJuecFoAC6g
On the int to salt the game, poor old #74 for UNI (6:05 mark)...gotta hand it to that kid, he gave it his absolute all to try to catch Soulek...almost wish he'da caught him!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: GDT: @ UNI for the MVFC title!
Originally posted by CappinHard View PostI understand the skepticism, but honestly... Show me s scenario where we don't get a seed.
I can easily see the committee not putting SDSU ahead of UCA solely based on record (9-2 vs 8-3). Even with their FBS win, you and I know that's vs a drastically worse schedule. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the committee doesn't see it that way. Even with the schmucking UCA took today, it was vs a higher ranked team, and I can see them not dropping them due to that.
I can easily see the committee not putting SDSU ahead of Richmond as well. Same record, again, even with their FBS win, vs a lighter schedule. Because East Coast bias.
Add in that would mean UND would probably leap both as well, and that'd mean 3 Dakota teams seeded? Yeah, I can easily easily see them not seeding SDSU.
I'll sit and wait and expect to not be seeded and be very happy if I'm wrong, rather than be pissed that I was right.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: