Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Playoffs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bozemaniac
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    Hosting, 6000 attendance this year.

    Leave a comment:


  • JackJD
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    In; hosting

    Leave a comment:


  • TailGatr
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    Whats's everyones prediction? We hosting or will we b on the road? (If we get in)

    Leave a comment:


  • SDSUAlum08
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    And no one thought they had a chance. I told you all!

    Leave a comment:


  • jack power
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    Originally posted by YanktonJack7 View Post
    They may be 8-4, but after playing a cream puff non-conference schedule, they don't look anything close to a playoff team.
    Yep. Their best win was a 1 pt. squeaker over SIU.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackmd
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    Originally posted by YanktonJack7 View Post
    They may be 8-4, but after playing a cream puff non-conference schedule, they don't look anything close to a playoff team.
    This is very true. I think YSU gets left out, not enough quality wins. Jackrabbits have 8 wins and are in a 4 way tie for second in the MVFC with losses to 2 of the 3 teams they are tied with. SIU only has 6 DI wins and Missouri State is 5-7 overall. The Jacks will get 1 of the 13 at-large bids and may get a home game. It will largely depend upon the other at-large teams and the geography of the top 8 seeds.

    Leave a comment:


  • RabbitObsessed
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    Originally posted by YanktonJack7 View Post
    They may be 8-4, but after playing a cream puff non-conference schedule, they don't look anything close to a playoff team.
    Disagree. Look a lot like Eastern Illinois last year

    Leave a comment:


  • jackmd
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    The teams awarded the top eight seeds shall receive a first round bye and are placed
    in the appropriate positions in the bracket (Nos. 1, 8, 4 and 5 in the upper half; Nos. 2,
    7, 3 and 6 in the lower half).

    b. The remaining 16 teams will play first round games and will be paired according to
    geographic proximity and then placed into the bracket according to geographic
    proximity of the top eight seeds previously placed into the bracket.

    c. The NCAA mileage threshold for mandatory team travel via ground is 400 miles.

    d. Teams from the same conference will not be paired for first-round games or for
    second round games when both teams are playing their first games of the
    championship (except for teams from the same conference that did not play against
    each other during the regular season; such teams may play each other in the
    first/second round).

    Site Selection for Preliminary Round Games
    The following criteria, as outlined in NCAA Bylaw 31.1.3.2.1, are to be used in the evaluation of
    sites for all competition in NCAA championships:
    1. Quality and availability of the facility and other necessary accommodations;
    2. Revenue potential (e.g., a financial guarantee or guideline that ensures fiscal responsibility
    and is appropriate for the particular event, as recommended by the governing sports
    committee and approved by the Division I Championships/Sports Management Cabinet);
    3. Attendance history and potential;
    4. Geographical location; and
    5. Championships operating costs.
    The following additional criteria will be followed:
    6. The committee will consider previous crowd-control measures and crowd behavior of the
    prospective host institution (regardless of seed).
    7. Prospective host institutions must submit the following minimum financial guarantees,
    which shall be 75 percent of the estimated net receipts as submitted on the proposed
    budget:
    First Round -- $30,000
    Second Round -- $30,000
    Quarterfinals -- $40,000
    Semifinals -- $50,000
    8. Proposed budgets will not be provided to the committee until the 24 championship teams
    have been determined and paired.
    9. If the minimum guarantees are met, the committee will award playoff sites to the higherseeded
    teams.

    Leave a comment:


  • sfjacksfan99
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    Illinois State went to App St and then to the opposite end of the country in EWU the next week last year. So unpredictable. If SDSU even broke even last year I would hope the same, if not slightly larger bid went in for this year. I think we're going to Brookings next weekend. Just a gut feeling.

    Leave a comment:


  • YanktonJack7
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    Originally posted by jack power View Post
    YSU has to be very worried.... 3 losses to close the season and the last one a blowout
    They may be 8-4, but after playing a cream puff non-conference schedule, they don't look anything close to a playoff team.

    Leave a comment:


  • jack power
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    YSU has to be very worried.... 3 losses to close the season and the last one a blowout

    Leave a comment:


  • jackmd
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    Here is a link outlining the selection process and principles:

    http://www.ncaa.com/fcs-selections-101

    Leave a comment:


  • TailGatr
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    Please Selection Committee, give me 1 more chance to TAILGATE at home!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • jackmd
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    Playoff selection show tomorrow morning. I gotta work so I will DVR it.

    This year’s 24 team playoff field will be announced live on ESPNU this Sunday, November 24th at 10:30 am CT, during the FCS Playoff Selection Show.

    Leave a comment:


  • jacksfan29
    replied
    Re: Playoffs

    This is not the 2009 version of Montana. Very different coach, very different team, very different talent level.

    Originally posted by SoDakJack View Post
    Seems like a game against Montana could get out of hand quickly with the way or secondary plays.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X