Re: Boo Summit League
Right. There's not a WIDE gap between NDSU's 177+ WBB Sagarin rating & SDSU's top 20 rating. It's mere piffle, just so much cottonwood fluff floating on the breeze.
Who said that SDSU's advantage in WBB comes from being 'first'? Where did I EVER say that? Where did ANYONE say that?
Again, who said that any of this is going to last 'forever'?
You're creating straw-men.
The reality is that SDSU's program is significantly better than other programs in the Dakotas. Significantly. If the 150 spot difference between SDSU & NDSU (to say nothing of where USD would've been had they played a full D-1 schedule) doesn't convince you, nothing will.
As long as the status quo in Brookings remains, there is every reason to believe that the results on the court will be what they have been. That's not being arrogant, that's being realistic. People that root for the Jacks have to be careful that they don't overrate the Jacks. People on the outside need to be careful that they understand just how good the Jacks are. Again, I refer you to the ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY place difference between SDSU & NDSU in the final Sagarin rankings.
Thanks for the history lesson. Of course, if D-2 glory meant all that, the 'Yotes'd still be D-2, now wouldn't they?
Again with the straw men.
Did I ever say that USD was going to stink?
Of course not.
I have consistently pointed out, as I will point out again, that in a very narrowly drawn area (women's basketball), SDSU at present, cannot be compared to ANY OTHER SCHOOL IN THE DAKOTAS.
Need I, once more, remind you of the difference in Sagarin ratings?
Because, I feel that it will be my lot in life to be the bucket of cold-water on these overheated discussions about 'catching' SDSU.
Heck, already some sources at NDSU have asserted that their last two recruiting classes have been 'better' than SDSU's.....
Folks, let's have some perspective.
Before SDSU, it was common to think that you couldn't win with local talent.
Now, it seems common to believe, 'well, if SDSU's doing it, it can't be that hard' (please see Zim's comments about whether a good D-2 program could shellac TCU the way SDSU did).
Sorry. Both positions are simplemindedly obtuse.
Originally posted by Coyote_Fan
View Post
the "being first" advantage goes away and then it's just program vs program.
SDSU is now on top but that doesn't mean it will remain that way forever. You just need to enjoy the success while it is here because as soon as it's taken for granted
You're creating straw-men.
The reality is that SDSU's program is significantly better than other programs in the Dakotas. Significantly. If the 150 spot difference between SDSU & NDSU (to say nothing of where USD would've been had they played a full D-1 schedule) doesn't convince you, nothing will.
As long as the status quo in Brookings remains, there is every reason to believe that the results on the court will be what they have been. That's not being arrogant, that's being realistic. People that root for the Jacks have to be careful that they don't overrate the Jacks. People on the outside need to be careful that they understand just how good the Jacks are. Again, I refer you to the ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY place difference between SDSU & NDSU in the final Sagarin rankings.
during the 70's and 80's USD was regularly beating SDSU and making the playoffs and an occassional major run at a national title. Something SDSU never really did.
You will have your share of successes but you are also going to have to accept that USD will also have their fair share of theirs.
Did I ever say that USD was going to stink?
Of course not.
I have consistently pointed out, as I will point out again, that in a very narrowly drawn area (women's basketball), SDSU at present, cannot be compared to ANY OTHER SCHOOL IN THE DAKOTAS.
Need I, once more, remind you of the difference in Sagarin ratings?
Because, I feel that it will be my lot in life to be the bucket of cold-water on these overheated discussions about 'catching' SDSU.
Heck, already some sources at NDSU have asserted that their last two recruiting classes have been 'better' than SDSU's.....
Folks, let's have some perspective.
Before SDSU, it was common to think that you couldn't win with local talent.
Now, it seems common to believe, 'well, if SDSU's doing it, it can't be that hard' (please see Zim's comments about whether a good D-2 program could shellac TCU the way SDSU did).
Sorry. Both positions are simplemindedly obtuse.
Comment