Nine members is a really sub-optimal number of members for a conference.
As far as I know, there's really been nothing, not even rumors, of potential Summit League expansion targets. There are two groups of potential SL members: current D-1 schools and D-II's. (St. Thomas is a unicorn as a direct D-III to D-I transfer, and NAIA to D-I would I think be even more unicorn-ish.)
I realize it's all the vogue in college athletics to totally ignore such trivial things as geographic fit, but I'm a traditionalist so that's what I'm going with--geographical fit defined vaguely as currently in or adjacent to a state with a Summit League team (and leaving off Texas as definitely out of SL territory)..
Given that, there are very few current D-I schools that might even contemplate a Summit League membership, as most are either geographically unsuited or in a "better" (FBS or high-end D-I-AAA) conference. I suppose there may be some perennial bottom-feeders in those conferences that might consider a move to the Summit League to "get right" but let's gloss over them for now. So, for giggles, these are the only two schools I'd realistically consider potential current D-I targets for the SL:
Central Arkansas (A-Sun)
Northern Colorado (Big Sky)
Reclassing from D-II to D-I now costs $5 million payable to the NCAA which makes it significantly more difficult. Even so, there are D-II's in the NSIC, RMAC, and MIAA that are large enough institutions (8-10k or larger student bodies) and/or in/close to decent enough markets to even consider the move:
NSIC:
Concordia-St. Paul
Minnesota-Duluth
Minnesota State-Mankato
St. Cloud State
RMAC
Colorado-Colorado Springs
Colorado School of Mines
MIAA
Central Missouri
Central Oklahoma
Washburn
So that's eleven targets. Some are more realistic than others, for all kinds of reasons, but ya work with what ya got.
As far as I know, there's really been nothing, not even rumors, of potential Summit League expansion targets. There are two groups of potential SL members: current D-1 schools and D-II's. (St. Thomas is a unicorn as a direct D-III to D-I transfer, and NAIA to D-I would I think be even more unicorn-ish.)
I realize it's all the vogue in college athletics to totally ignore such trivial things as geographic fit, but I'm a traditionalist so that's what I'm going with--geographical fit defined vaguely as currently in or adjacent to a state with a Summit League team (and leaving off Texas as definitely out of SL territory)..
Given that, there are very few current D-I schools that might even contemplate a Summit League membership, as most are either geographically unsuited or in a "better" (FBS or high-end D-I-AAA) conference. I suppose there may be some perennial bottom-feeders in those conferences that might consider a move to the Summit League to "get right" but let's gloss over them for now. So, for giggles, these are the only two schools I'd realistically consider potential current D-I targets for the SL:
Central Arkansas (A-Sun)
Northern Colorado (Big Sky)
Reclassing from D-II to D-I now costs $5 million payable to the NCAA which makes it significantly more difficult. Even so, there are D-II's in the NSIC, RMAC, and MIAA that are large enough institutions (8-10k or larger student bodies) and/or in/close to decent enough markets to even consider the move:
NSIC:
Concordia-St. Paul
Minnesota-Duluth
Minnesota State-Mankato
St. Cloud State
RMAC
Colorado-Colorado Springs
Colorado School of Mines
MIAA
Central Missouri
Central Oklahoma
Washburn
So that's eleven targets. Some are more realistic than others, for all kinds of reasons, but ya work with what ya got.
Comment