Re: Feds seize channelsurfing domain
My heart is with you, Sturgis. I talk to my students about how the mainstream definitions of what is acceptable speech and what is not shift over time. Laws are just words on paper, after all, and humans either enforce those laws (or not).
But as you point out, this is really about Copyright, not free speech. Again, you could make a strong argument that our copyright law doesn't reflect the reality of digital, networked communication. You can argue that corporations have hijacked the copyright law to protect their interests while limiting our access to information (whenever Mickey Mouse nears the public domain, Disney spends a gazillion dollars in Congress and copyright gets extended another 25 years).
But seizing a Web domain over alleged copyright infringement and closing down a media organization in violation of First Amendment principles are two very different things. And nobody on either side of the political spectrum has made a move to do the latter... thank goodness.
Originally posted by SturgisJeff
View Post
But as you point out, this is really about Copyright, not free speech. Again, you could make a strong argument that our copyright law doesn't reflect the reality of digital, networked communication. You can argue that corporations have hijacked the copyright law to protect their interests while limiting our access to information (whenever Mickey Mouse nears the public domain, Disney spends a gazillion dollars in Congress and copyright gets extended another 25 years).
But seizing a Web domain over alleged copyright infringement and closing down a media organization in violation of First Amendment principles are two very different things. And nobody on either side of the political spectrum has made a move to do the latter... thank goodness.
Comment