Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • UWMandSDSU
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    Originally posted by Nidaros View Post
    SD more so since taxation is heavily depended on Sales tax and lottery transactions. Both are way down.
    SD Lottery is not down.

    http://www.lotteryinsider.com/lottery/sdakota.htm

    Leave a comment:


  • Nidaros
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    Originally posted by NoVaJack View Post
    What's the old saying, "you can't legislate morality?"
    Add to it, "you can't legislate more rivalry."

    I personally think Jacks should play Coyotes every year in every available sport; UND, too. If for no other reason than to build a kind of multiplier on regional D-1 interest. I do think there is something to be said for that, no matter what you think that the way the Yotes and (insert offensive mascot here) have gone about their transitions. But the state should have nothing to do with setting up FB schedules for rivalry purposes.
    Could you not then see legislators representing Madison and all the other smaller state schools demanding a "big" payday game from the D-1 Schools? They ARE state schools, after all.
    One of our fellow alums, Gov Mike Rounds has been in the TV news clips a great deal and SD like Va is hurting financially. SD more so since taxation is heavily depended on Sales tax and lottery transactions. Both are way down, and the financial picture for SD is kind of bleak right now. For a legislator to ask for money for athletics, would in the present be much like the banks on Wall street who got TARP money, paying themself a bonus. There is no doubt in my mind that the four Dakota's will be scheduling each other every year once the transition period is passed, and for that reason, the bill is not needed period.

    Leave a comment:


  • NoVaJack
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    Originally posted by Nidaros View Post
    If our pro SDSU salons are smart, they will attach amendments begging for money for athletes. Then watch the bill be flushed down the river to Kansas City No offense Filbert.

    What's the old saying, "you can't legislate morality?"
    Add to it, "you can't legislate more rivalry."

    I personally think Jacks should play Coyotes every year in every available sport; UND, too. If for no other reason than to build a kind of multiplier on regional D-1 interest. I do think there is something to be said for that, no matter what you think that the way the Yotes and (insert offensive mascot here) have gone about their transitions. But the state should have nothing to do with setting up FB schedules for rivalry purposes.
    Could you not then see legislators representing Madison and all the other smaller state schools demanding a "big" payday game from the D-1 Schools? They ARE state schools, after all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nidaros
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    Originally posted by filbert View Post
    This might make some small amount of sense if state money was allowed to go to the athletic programs in SD--which it is not, today, at least for SDSU, that was one of the conditions that the BOR put on the move to D-I.

    If I was SDSU, I'd say "well, fine, you go ahead and legislate a requirement for USD and SDSU to play, but you also lift the restrictions on state money going to support the athletic programs--fair is fair. If you want to decide what our athletic schedules are, you should be helping to pay for it."

    In today's economy, this will of course go exactly nowhere, but might serve the constructive purpose of drawing legislators' attention to the current lack of funding of the intercollegiate athletics program from state funding.
    If our pro SDSU salons are smart, they will attach amendments begging for money for athletes. Then watch the bill be flushed down the river to Kansas City No offense Filbert.

    Leave a comment:


  • joeboo22
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    I just think that football would be nearly impossible because both schools will have D-I FBS games.. plus conference games add in the previous contracted games and its 5-7 years down the line before you could even make it a possibility.... by then I think that there is a good chance that they'll be playing each other anyways....

    Leave a comment:


  • filbert
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    Originally posted by jackwatcher View Post
    Do not be surprised if you see a similar bill introduced in Pierre next week. I am hoping that the reaction they got in North Dakota might make the ones that were going to bring it to the House rethink things.
    This might make some small amount of sense if state money was allowed to go to the athletic programs in SD--which it is not, today, at least for SDSU, that was one of the conditions that the BOR put on the move to D-I.

    If I was SDSU, I'd say "well, fine, you go ahead and legislate a requirement for USD and SDSU to play, but you also lift the restrictions on state money going to support the athletic programs--fair is fair. If you want to decide what our athletic schedules are, you should be helping to pay for it."

    In today's economy, this will of course go exactly nowhere, but might serve the constructive purpose of drawing legislators' attention to the current lack of funding of the intercollegiate athletics program from state funding.

    Leave a comment:


  • joeboo22
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    I could understand basketball because it wouldn't be that hard for the schools to figure something out, but football is ALOT tougher to work things out....

    Leave a comment:


  • jackwatcher
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    Do not be surprised if you see a similar bill introduced in Pierre next week. I am hoping that the reaction they got in North Dakota might make the ones that were going to bring it to the House rethink things.

    Leave a comment:


  • NoVaJack
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    Originally posted by mango4 View Post
    More discussion can be found HERE
    Thanks, missed earlier thread. Apparently at least one sponsor got such blowback from NDSU constituents he decided that if he will testify on the bill he will be against it. Real profile in courage there.

    Leave a comment:


  • mango4
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    Originally posted by NoVaJack View Post
    Put this in smack section because it seems that the cold has literally gone to the heads of some North Dakota legislators.
    Seems that some North Dakota solons want to put it into law that the Bison and Sioux meet on the gridiron annually.
    Recession? What recession?
    Talk about your government mandates.


    http://www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/61-...t/JBSV0100.pdf

    One ex-sponsor has already felt the heat:

    http://www.inforum.com/event/article...16/group/home/
    More discussion can be found HERE

    Leave a comment:


  • EQguy
    replied
    Re: Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    You should never trust any bill presented by someone named Weezie

    Leave a comment:


  • NoVaJack
    started a topic Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    Legislating a Bison-Sioux rivalry

    Put this in smack section because it seems that the cold has literally gone to the heads of some North Dakota legislators.
    Seems that some North Dakota solons want to put it into law that the Bison and Sioux meet on the gridiron annually.
    Recession? What recession?
    Talk about your government mandates.


    http://www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/61-...t/JBSV0100.pdf

    One ex-sponsor has already felt the heat:

    http://www.inforum.com/event/article...16/group/home/
Working...
X