The tag line for the pro sports section is pretty accurate. Pujols jumps ship and goes to the Angels for 250,000,000 for 10 years. That is a lot of wing wangs. I wonder if it will tarnish his legacy any? Now I dont think he will rival stan the man in St louis anymore.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pujols
Collapse
X
-
Re: Pujols
Trash his legacy? He's still one of the best of all time, not matter where he plays. He got paid, good for him. And no one can say he is all about money either, because from everything I've heard, the Marlins deal would have been worth more money after taxes.Originally posted by JackFan96Well, I don't get to sit in Mom's basement and watch sports all day
Comment
-
Re: Pujols
Originally posted by RabbitObsessed View PostTrash his legacy? He's still one of the best of all time, not matter where he plays. He got paid, good for him. And no one can say he is all about money either, because from everything I've heard, the Marlins deal would have been worth more money after taxes."The most rewarding things you do in life, are often the ones that look like they cannot be done.” Arnold Palmer
Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
Comment
-
Re: Pujols
I dont blame him, most of us probably would too. I just think Cardinals fans would have stayed with him the whole career if his numbers started to decline they wouldnt get mad. Honestly in a pitchers park and his numbers were not as good the last couple years, it could affects his career numbers and Angel fans might get a little bothered by the 25 million a year if he only hits .290 and 30+ homers a year. Those are not bad numbers, but not 25 million a year numbers to a new team, they might expect more."The most rewarding things you do in life, are often the ones that look like they cannot be done.” Arnold Palmer
Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
Comment
-
Re: Pujols
Originally posted by RabbitObsessed View PostSigned, 3 years ago?
He probably would have been worth it then. Can't see paying a guy that kind of cash into his 40's.
Ask the Rangers how the A-rod deal worked out for them....and A-rod was way younger.
Comment
-
Re: Pujols
Originally posted by MontanaRabbit View PostNot sure what you are saying, but I can guess you are saying he may be worth the money if he was signed three years ago?????
He probably would have been worth it then. Can't see paying a guy that kind of cash into his 40's.
Ask the Rangers how the A-rod deal worked out for them....and A-rod was way younger.Originally posted by JackFan96Well, I don't get to sit in Mom's basement and watch sports all day
Comment
-
Re: Pujols
Originally posted by RabbitObsessed View PostI'm saying that he was the best player in the game 3 years ago but to say that he is no question the best player today is ridiculous."The most rewarding things you do in life, are often the ones that look like they cannot be done.” Arnold Palmer
Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
Comment
-
Re: Pujols
Originally posted by RabbitObsessed View PostI'm saying that he was the best player in the game 3 years ago but to say that he is no question the best player today is ridiculous.
Comment
Comment