I'm sure the prosecuter cringed when that came out. Nothing like giving a jury a negative opinion of the accuser.
"The purpose of life is not to be happy - but to matter, to be productive, to be useful, to have it make some difference that you have lived at all."
-Leo Rosten
The prosecution has rested. I guess we'll read more tomorrow.......
The article in the Argus today, IMHO, skirted the limits of reporting about a rape case. By reporting the association of the victim to SDSU and her relative height, it's very easy to make conjecture re: the ID of the victim. This is bad enough in a normal case, but this is a a high-profile situation (by SD standards) and the anti-interracial comment could be construed as racism.
The prosecution has rested. I guess we'll read more tomorrow.......
The article in the Argus today, IMHO, skirted the limits of reporting about a rape case. By reporting the association of the victim to SDSU and her relative height, it's very easy to make conjecture re: the ID of the victim. This is bad enough in a normal case, but this is a a high-profile situation (by SD standards) and the anti-interracial comment could be construed as racism.
When the accused has alleged the sex was consensual, then is that not racial too? If indeed it did happen consensually,it would involve two members of different races. The states attorney is trying to build a case that there was no consenual sex and that a rape occurred, and if she is saying that she does not sleep with other members of other racess, is that not the point he is trying to make?
I think the defense has to prove it was consensual, and with lying testimony to investigators, its going to be hard to do. Also the comment about the victim being unattractive, does not help the accused.
I am not sure that I would want to be on this jury. The lies/half-truths have been flying since this thing started (from both sides). It could come down to who is more believable.
"The purpose of life is not to be happy - but to matter, to be productive, to be useful, to have it make some difference that you have lived at all."
-Leo Rosten
All: I suggest to you that analysis and commentary of an ongoing trial based on the limited reporting of news outlets is neither a prudent or an appropriate activity on an Internet discussion board. We are not in possession of all of the evidence and testimony being presented. We will not decide the case on this board. We're frankly in no position to make any kind of judgments regarding the trial. This isn't an episode of "Law & Order," it's the real thing, with real people.
Please extend the courtesy of sensitivity to those involved, and their families, friends, and associates.
I'm with EQguy . . . I don't think I'd want to be on the jury, either. Godspeed to them.
The only certainty right now is that three young people's lives have been forever changed, and not for the better. And that's the tragedy here, regardless of how the jury decides.
One last thought: the legal standard, I believe, is "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law."
All: I suggest to you that analysis and commentary of an ongoing trial based on the limited reporting of news outlets is neither a prudent or an appropriate activity on an Internet discussion board. We are not in possession of all of the evidence and testimony being presented. We will not decide the case on this board. We're frankly in no position to make any kind of judgments regarding the trial. This isn't an episode of "Law & Order," it's the real thing, with real people.
Please extend the courtesy of sensitivity to those involved, and their families, friends, and associates.
I'm with EQguy . . . I don't think I'd want to be on the jury, either. Godspeed to them.
The only certainty right now is that three young people's lives have been forever changed, and not for the better. And that's the tragedy here, regardless of how the jury decides.
One last thought: the legal standard, I believe, is "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law."
Well Filbert, you tipped the soapbox over with that last line. Good try though.
We are here to add what we can to life, not get what we can from life. -Sir William Osler
We do not see things as they are, we see things as we are.
[quote author=filbert link=1165890748/0#9 date=1166058144]All: I suggest to you that analysis and commentary of an ongoing trial based on the limited reporting of news outlets is neither a prudent or an appropriate activity on an Internet discussion board. We are not in possession of all of the evidence and testimony being presented. We will not decide the case on this board. We're frankly in no position to make any kind of judgments regarding the trial. This isn't an episode of "Law & Order," it's the real thing, with real people.
Please extend the courtesy of sensitivity to those involved, and their families, friends, and associates.
I'm with EQguy . . . I don't think I'd want to be on the jury, either. Godspeed to them.
The only certainty right now is that three young people's lives have been forever changed, and not for the better. And that's the tragedy here, regardless of how the jury decides.
One last thought: the legal standard, I believe, is "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law."
Well Filbert, you tipped the soapbox over with that last line. Good try though.
[/quote]
*shrug*
I'm working on my balance but I'll admit that I have a ways to go.
The prosecution has rested. I guess we'll read more tomorrow.......
The article in the Argus today, IMHO, skirted the limits of reporting about a rape case. By reporting the association of the victim to SDSU and her relative height, it's very easy to make conjecture re: the ID of the victim. This is bad enough in a normal case, but this is a a high-profile situation (by SD standards) and the anti-interracial comment could be construed as racism.
When the accused has alleged the sex was consensual, then is that not racial too? If indeed it did happen consensually,it would involve two members of different races. The states attorney is trying to build a case that there was no consenual sex and that a rape occurred, and if she is saying that she does not sleep with other members of other racess, is that not the point he is trying to make?
I think the defense has to prove it was consensual, and with lying testimony to investigators, its going to be hard to do. Also the comment about the victim being unattractive, does not help the accused.[/quote]
Not to knit-pick (sp), but the burden of proof lies soley with the prosecution.
The only certainty right now is that three young people's lives have been forever changed, and not for the better. And that's the tragedy here, regardless of how the jury decides.
Comment