Originally posted by 1stRowFANatic
View Post
At real life speed, I think the ref blows that call a lot.
Notice I didn't say that play would be a foul nine times out of ten, but that the ref calls a foul nine times out of ten. It looks like a foul occurs if your assumption is 'there's no way their hands didn't get tied up, and because she was in pursuit, the defender initiated the contact, ergo, foul on #10.'
How often have you seen instant replays of breakaway 3 point plays, with the announcers saying, "you know, I just don't see the foul there...."?
Without knowing all the particulars of officiating in basketball, I can only use a few analogies: in baseball first base umps are taught to watch the bag and listen for the sound of the ball in the glove (at least that used to be the case) because if you watch the ball into the glove and then look down to the bag the baserunner's foot may already be there.
In football, refs are taught to watch D-linemen's names and numbers--if they get distorted, they're being held. Why? Well, what else is an O-lineman going to hold? The O-lineman grabs the D-lineman outside the permitted area and it will twist the D-lineman's jersey. The ref can see that and throws the flag.
Point being, where officials can't see something exactly (either because they can't look two places at once, or because they're not in position to see what's actually going on), they rely on certain cues. In this case, I think (not saying it for certain, but it's what I think happened), the ref saw Young's right arm almost immediately under Morrow's (?) right arm with apparent contact between Young and Morrow that had to be called, split second--and IMO the arms -almost- entwined, the pursuit, and the near contact were enough to make the ref jump to a conclusion that wasn't supported by review.
Leave a comment: