Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nebraska 2013

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TK22867
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by timeforachange
    TK first of all what money do I owe you? I never once had your tickets in my possession so why would I pay you? Secondly my inbox is far from full. And why would I be banned, I did nothing wrong. Like I said through private message I apologize I didn't take your tickets but I wasn't the reason you got stuck with them if you did. Like I said you can choose to get over it or continue to vent like a 12 year old who said they were getting candy after supper but didn't.
    No, you don't owe me money (unlike Jacks1) and I never said you did. You've never apologized, so feel free to continue your string of lies - nobody believes you. I've pretty much explained everything I need to here and am done commenting on this. If you can't find fault in any of your actions, you've got a lot of learning to do. Jacks1 put it best - GTFO.

    Leave a comment:


  • common sense rabbit
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by timeforachange
    JackMd are you saying Sumner is not a winner? If so I am curious as tto what your basing that off of? Name me another school in the fcs that has more sub par receivers that cant get seperation like we do. I'm not blaming it all on the receivers but how do you expect anymore? Yes he takes a couple sacks but you cabt throw the ball away inside the pocket.
    TEAMS win and TEAMS lose... If dB's can't cover very well and we know it then our D-line has to get pressure on the QB. If our Wr's can't run/get open according to u and by the way I would disagree then our -O-line has to try and provide more protection... Our Db's have it tougher than our opponent Db's cause we know most teams are going to throw the deep ball now and then.. Our offensive system is not designed to do that.. Dink and dunk, dink and dunk! To say our Wr's are sub-par is ridiculous... Sumner is good but it would be nice if he would throw the thing down the field once in awhile to keep the defense honest... Much easier for a WR to adjust to a deep ball than a db.. I understand our system is not about that but maybe it should be... Would also help out the best running back in the FCS that being Zenner.

    Leave a comment:


  • TK22867
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by timeforachange
    But TK Has absolutely no reason to be mad. I said if I cld make it up there I wld take his tickets I cldnt end of story!
    100% wrong. You sir, are a flat out liar. No wonder your PMs are full. Everyone like Jacks1 are looking for their money!

    Do yourself a favor and move on from this Board. I'd love to see you banned, but I know it won't happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jackedforlife
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by jacks1 View Post
    Nah, I've made myself look bad enough getting sucked into this. It should never have had to come down to this. I've learned a lesson...other board members can draw their own conclusions.
    I drew a conclusion based on his poor use of the words "your" and "you're".

    Leave a comment:


  • jacks1
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by timeforachange
    Do what you gta do man. Its thirty dollars. I have no problem re-sending a check. I can understand your upset that you didn't get it. But TK Has absolutely no reason to be mad. I said if I cld make it up there I wld take his tickets I cldnt end of story!
    Nah, I've made myself look bad enough getting sucked into this. It should never have had to come down to this. I've learned a lesson...other board members can draw their own conclusions.

    Leave a comment:


  • jack power
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sONfxPCTU0

    Leave a comment:


  • jacks1
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by timeforachange
    I did send a check to your sir. You can ask the same guy I got my tickets for this year as to whether or not he got my check and well yes he did.
    Bull****. You are a flat out liar. Do I need to post all of the PM's and excuses you had for me from two years ago? And then all of a sudden you wouldn't respond to me anymore, just like you did to TK. GTFO of here as far as I'm concerned.

    Edit: How about since it got 'lost in the mail', and therefore obviously never cleared your bank, we meet up this week in person and you can pay me the $30 you owe me. Let me guess, you won't show up...

    Leave a comment:


  • jacks1
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by TK22867 View Post
    Your post pretty much says it all. A response to my MULTIPLE texts to you would have been nice. Or better yet, how bout an apology?
    When you posted that someone backed out on 'buying' your tickets, I had a gut instinct who it was. Yup...timeforachange. The same board member that 'bought' my tickets to the NDSU game two years ago and never sent the check. What a crock of you know what.

    Leave a comment:


  • TK22867
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by timeforachange
    Hey TK I suggest ya watch who your talking to because in fact you may not know the story. Conclusion being maybe a phone was lost therefore lost your number? Maybe a family memver couldn't make it therefore I helped then out and purchased their tickets? Don't be butt hurt bc I didn't purchase your tickets. Wasn't my responsibility too. I said I'd meet you if I could. I didn't make it to the game last weekend because of business. And I will choose to rant about anyone I choose too. And your gonna speak to me about integrity haha. Defenition being doing the right thing when no one is looking. What does that have to do with purchasing tickets? Ill be at the game saturday so if you choose you can come find me and we can discuss your displeasure no problem.
    Your post pretty much says it all. A response to my MULTIPLE texts to you would have been nice. Or better yet, how bout an apology?

    Leave a comment:


  • TK22867
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by timeforachange
    JackMd are you saying Sumner is not a winner? If so I am curious as tto what your basing that off of? Name me another school in the fcs that has more sub par receivers that cant get seperation like we do. I'm not blaming it all on the receivers but how do you expect anymore? Yes he takes a couple sacks but you cabt throw the ball away inside the pocket.
    I've bit my tongue long enough. Why don't you go post about Sumner on the UND Board and not come back to this one? I prefer to only have members on this board with INTEGRITY. INTEGRITY = adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; honesty.

    Committing to purchasing someone's tickets (in this case, a season ticket holder) - even arranging a place to meet - and then not even having the INTEGRITY to tell that season ticket holder that you no longer will be purchasing said tickets and going completely dark.....well, that should be unacceptable as a standard for this board.

    I was willing to give you a pass considering I didn't know you personally (could of been a family death...or you could have been hit by the beer truck), but since you are back posting on this board, I am inclined to put you on blast.

    Before I get flamed for discussing a poster - I ran my situation by a mod, and this was the best solution available. I will also note that I've had several ticket transactions with other posters on this board (SFRabbit, leeshajo) that have gone flawlessly, and it was my pleasure to finally get to meet each of them in person.

    Leave a comment:


  • timeforachange
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Say what ya want. We were 3-0 before this week regardless of how poorly we have played we have won!

    Leave a comment:


  • RabbitObsessed
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by timeforachange
    I wld defend any player regardless of who they are. But to say anyone of the state players aren't winners don't watch if you don't have any good to say. Again regardless of any player!
    Okay, but your posts are still all about Sumner. Definitely not odd.

    Leave a comment:


  • RabbitObsessed
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by timeforachange
    JackMd are you saying Sumner is not a winner? If so I am curious as tto what your basing that off of? Name me another school in the fcs that has more sub par receivers that cant get seperation like we do. I'm not blaming it all on the receivers but how do you expect anymore? Yes he takes a couple sacks but you cabt throw the ball away inside the pocket.
    Why are all of your posts everywhere about Sumner? Friend or relative? You even joined the UND board and made posts and they were about Sumner.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigticket1
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by jackmd View Post
    Worse than Illinois.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
    Strongly disagree . The Jacks didn't show up in Illinois . 56-3 against a lower tier Big Ten team . Six first downs , only one rushing. 96 total yards. This Nebraska team won't win the Big Ten , but it wouldn't surprise me if they get things figured out enough to be in the top 4 by the end of the season.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nidaros
    replied
    Re: Nebraska 2013

    Originally posted by jackmd View Post
    Really bad here in Lincoln. On to The Bison. No reason to think the jacks will compete based on today's performance. The sun will come up tomorrow. Uffda.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
    I did not know that Uffda was in the Finnish language.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X