Originally posted by Hammersmith
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
St. Thomas to Summit / Missouri Valley?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by UWMandSDSU View Post“While this legislation is under consideration, the Council indicated it would be receptive to a formal waiver request from Division III St. Thomas (Minnesota) and the Summit League that would allow the school to begin the reclassification process.“
http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/...ome-di-members
Leave a comment:
-
“While this legislation is under consideration, the Council indicated it would be receptive to a formal waiver request from Division III St. Thomas (Minnesota) and the Summit League that would allow the school to begin the reclassification process.“
http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/...ome-di-members
Leave a comment:
-
Remember it's the School's Presidents that vote on membership. Not the Commissioner or ADs
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BTownJack View Post
It will be interesting to see where this goes. Douple has been very non-committal about it all when in front of a crowd. The SF media and most others think it is a "done deal" but then it's been very quiet on the D-I front from Augie itself. Hopefully Douple will talk in front of the SF staters crowd again leading into the SL BB Tourney and addresses where they stand on it. Last year at that event he said something of the like "I've heard all this noise about Augie and we have yet to have a single conversation with them."
I do know this - IMHO our coaches would rather have Augie vs. St. Thomas. All of our sports hammer the Minneapolis metro area for recruits. You elevate St. Thomas to D-I status and put them in our conference. Suddenly there is legit competition up there for recruits. It could have a fairly big impact for our sports who pull kids up there on a regular basis.
Leave a comment:
-
If I'm Douple I tell St. Thomas that the Summit League will do everything it can to help the transition to D-I (schedule games/matches, help with the NCAA studies/paperwork, etc.) all the way through even if the NCAA doesn't come through with the waiver. St. Thomas would be a hit on the number of non-D-I matches/games each sports team could schedule, but I'd be prepared to be all-in for St. Thomas if I were the Summit League.
It's a unique situation (literally--what's happened to St. Thomas has never happened before as far as I know) and it needs creative thinking by all concerned.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MontanaRabbit View Post
Isn't St. Thomas to the Summit a done deal?
http://www.startribune.com/st-thomas...n-i/564636222/
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CappinHard View Post
St. Thomas will end up going D1 regardless, they'll find a home somewhere.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BTownJack View Post
It will be interesting to see where this goes. Douple has been very non-committal about it all when in front of a crowd. The SF media and most others think it is a "done deal" but then it's been very quiet on the D-I front from Augie itself. Hopefully Douple will talk in front of the SF staters crowd again leading into the SL BB Tourney and addresses where they stand on it. Last year at that event he said something of the like "I've heard all this noise about Augie and we have yet to have a single conversation with them."
I do know this - IMHO our coaches would rather have Augie vs. St. Thomas. All of our sports hammer the Minneapolis metro area for recruits. You elevate St. Thomas to D-I status and put them in our conference. Suddenly there is legit competition up there for recruits. It could have a fairly big impact for our sports who pull kids up there on a regular basis.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BTownJack View Post
It will be interesting to see where this goes. Douple has been very non-committal about it all when in front of a crowd. The SF media and most others think it is a "done deal" but then it's been very quiet on the D-I front from Augie itself. Hopefully Douple will talk in front of the SF staters crowd again leading into the SL BB Tourney and addresses where they stand on it. Last year at that event he said something of the like "I've heard all this noise about Augie and we have yet to have a single conversation with them."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MontanaRabbit View Post
I'll say this about Augie to the Summit. I spoke with a very high ranking SDSU official and unless this person was lying, SDSU will not support Augie to the Summit League.
I do know this - IMHO our coaches would rather have Augie vs. St. Thomas. All of our sports hammer the Minneapolis metro area for recruits. You elevate St. Thomas to D-I status and put them in our conference. Suddenly there is legit competition up there for recruits. It could have a fairly big impact for our sports who pull kids up there on a regular basis.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BTownJack View Post
Thanks for the article. I would like to know how much any conference, especially the SL in this instance, really cares how many teams are in their league. They aren't going to keep Augie out just because it makes for an odd # of 11. Yes, I understand travel partners and an even number of teams is ideal but I'm guessing it is a minor factor considering how much movement in the college landscape there is right now.
Leave a comment:
-
Lots of reasons to care. Start with the Benjamins. More teams more mouths to feed. Corp. Sponsorship dollars, other schools worried about another trip to SD, the list goes on and on.
However this thread is about St. Thomas, and I'm glad the news for them sounds positive. Getting the Summit League in the Twin Cities market is a good thing
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LakeJack View Post
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: