Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1962

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SF_Rabbit_Fan
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by jackmd View Post
    I have 2 degrees from SDSU, 1 from USD and I'm on the faculty at USD. Yeah, USD pays me to lecture to and mentor medical students. Take a guess where my thousands of dollars in donations go each year? You only get one guess.

    In fact, that gives me an idea, I might start taking whatever money comes directly to me from USD and give it right to SDSU. Oh snap, that might just work. I wonder if I could just get them to send the money straight to the SDSU Foundation and Jackrabbit Club. I'd need to get the receipts in my name for tax purposes but it would save me some time.
    That would be hilarious!

    Leave a comment:


  • jackmd
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by Coyote_Fan View Post
    USD doesn't need to give a high quantity of student a medicore education. They focus on giving high quality education to those that have the aspirations to do good things for society and make a nice stash at the same time. USD can basically produce fewer total graduates and still create alot of earned income for their graduates with the types of course offerings that they offer.
    I have 2 degrees from SDSU, 1 from USD and I'm on the faculty at USD. Yeah, USD pays me to lecture to and mentor medical students. Take a guess where my thousands of dollars in donations go each year? You only get one guess.

    In fact, that gives me an idea, I might start taking whatever money comes directly to me from USD and give it right to SDSU. Oh snap, that might just work. I wonder if I could just get them to send the money straight to the SDSU Foundation and Jackrabbit Club. I'd need to get the receipts in my name for tax purposes but it would save me some time.

    Leave a comment:


  • MontanaRabbit
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by SturgisJeff View Post
    Daktronics, Jay Lohr Winery, golf course designer.
    Let's not forget Adam Vintieri....probably the clutchest kicker in NFL history.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackmd
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by RabbitObserver View Post
    I would hope so. SDSU started four years earlier.
    Tell me more about how badly the U team that lost to a DII team would beat our men's BB team. I admitted that they SEEM to have a solid core and good recruits but you have to play the games. Keep thinking that its all going to be okay. It worked for SDSU why wouldn't it work the same for USD?

    Leave a comment:


  • RabbitObsessed
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by KUlawJack View Post
    We are so much further ahead in transition and you have to dwell in transition hell.
    I would hope so. SDSU started four years earlier.

    Leave a comment:


  • SturgisJeff
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by UWMandSDSU View Post
    You can also add our Governor Mike Rounds into the mix as well. SDSU alum
    Daktronics, Jay Lohr Winery, golf course designer.

    Leave a comment:


  • UWMandSDSU
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by SturgisJeff View Post
    Hmmm
    BB Lady Jacks lead the nation in GPA three years running, All classes by the way. All Academic Americans in every sport. Multiple athletes in every sport. Future Cabinet Sec. from SDSU I think we got you beat in success catagory too.
    You can also add our Governor Mike Rounds into the mix as well. SDSU alum

    Leave a comment:


  • SturgisJeff
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by Coyote_Fan View Post
    USD doesn't need to give a high quantity of student a medicore education. They focus on giving high quality education to those that have the aspirations to do good things for society and make a nice stash at the same time. USD can basically produce fewer total graduates and still create alot of earned income for their graduates with the types of course offerings that they offer.
    Hmmm
    BB Lady Jacks lead the nation in GPA three years running, All classes by the way. All Academic Americans in every sport. Multiple athletes in every sport. Future Cabinet Sec. from SDSU I think we got you beat in success catagory too.

    Leave a comment:


  • JimmyJack
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by Coyote_Fan View Post
    USD doesn't need to give a high quantity of student a medicore education. They focus on giving high quality education to those that have the aspirations to do good things for society and make a nice stash at the same time. USD can basically produce fewer total graduates and still create alot of earned income for their graduates with the types of course offerings that they offer.
    How many S.D. Opportunity Scholarship winners chose USD? Do a search on this board, and you'll find an answer that no doubt will surprise you and will contradict your first sentence. And that's just one measure. By any objective measure, SDSU gets the majority of the best students in the state. And please spare me the value judgments about whose students do good things for society. How might a person measure that, exactly? The same way you determine that your football team is superior to ours? The same way they count attendance at the Dome? Look, USD is a fine academic institution, as is SDSU. You just embarrass yourself by dusting off the Harvard on the Prairie argument that your own administration has abandoned.

    Leave a comment:


  • RABBITALUM08
    replied
    Re: 1962

    One day after you clowns from USD loose again and have another lousy season and you are on our fan site. I guess I don't get why you would even be on a site for SDSU fans (hence the name). USD tried to say how dumb it was when we became D1, and look who followed. It's time to admit that USD is only hoping to become a fraction of what State has. The difference in the fans and football team isn't even close. Go Jacks!

    Leave a comment:


  • Coyote_Fan
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by KUlawJack View Post
    Oh snap! I laughed out loud when I read this part. Beautiful, JJ, beautiful. I am actually a little jealous because I didn't come up with it!

    Coyote Fan's posts make me think he might be the dumbest person on the planet, and I know so stupid people (mostly USD grads).

    Disclaimer - This post does not apply to persons who earned an undergraduate degree from South Dakota State University and then earned a graduate degree from udot. udot does have some value, but that value does not exist in its sports programs or undergraduate education. Those things are worthless.
    USD doesn't need to give a high quantity of student a medicore education. They focus on giving high quality education to those that have the aspirations to do good things for society and make a nice stash at the same time. USD can basically produce fewer total graduates and still create alot of earned income for their graduates with the types of course offerings that they offer.

    Leave a comment:


  • KUlawJack
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by JimmyJack View Post
    I love that you started a smack thread and then immediately posted a "congratulations" as if your smack never happened. 180 degrees in 58 minutes. You're about as consistent as USD's kicker.
    Oh snap! I laughed out loud when I read this part. Beautiful, JJ, beautiful. I am actually a little jealous because I didn't come up with it!

    Coyote Fan's posts make me think he might be the dumbest person on the planet, and I know so stupid people (mostly USD grads).

    Disclaimer - This post does not apply to persons who earned an undergraduate degree from South Dakota State University and then earned a graduate degree from udot. udot does have some value, but that value does not exist in its sports programs or undergraduate education. The value is solely contained in its graduate schools.

    Leave a comment:


  • jacksfaninne
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by Coyote_Fan View Post
    I won't try to talk intelligently
    Thank you, Mr. Obvious.

    Leave a comment:


  • JimmyJack
    replied
    Re: 1962

    Originally posted by Coyote_Fan View Post
    That is ridiculous, it's also very arrogant. I hope you're student athletes have that attitude and hope they keep that attitude. That kind of attitude brings complacency and not respecting your old rivals can really come back to haunt you. Hopefully for your sake that doesn't happen to your athletes.
    If you knew ANYTHING about SDSU's student athletes, you'd know that arrogance is not part of the student athlete experience at SDSU. Look at our coaches: Stig, AJ, etc.... humility is what they're all about.

    Originally posted by Coyote_Fan View Post
    Whatever you want to believe the gap should definately be closing some more next year. USD's extra scholarships will kick in a bit more and they won't be graduating hardly anyone compared to last year. Most of USD's offense will be back and the defense was improved this year. On the other hand SDSU will be losing quite a few players so it will be tougher to have a better year next year.
    And again, you betray your ignorance with an asinine statement. Just having 63 scholarships means very little since most of those new players are either redshirting or they're 18-year-olds who need some time to grow up. We're just beginning to see the difference in our depth from full funding. It takes four or probably five years for full funding to really pay off.

    By the way, most of our defense is back. And most of our offense, too. We'll miss a great senior class, but the way our program is designed, the attitude is that whoever's playing is first string. And they play like that.

    I love that you started a smack thread and then immediately posted a "congratulations" as if your smack never happened. 180 degrees in 58 minutes. You're about as consistent as USD's kicker.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rabbitden
    replied
    Re: 1962

    The problem here CF is we are not hiding (running, yes), way ahead of U period. By the way, u period, hmmmm...I just dont understand why you would refer your school to a menstral cycle.

    CF you come here because nobody cares on your site and you secretly wish you could hang with your big brother. It's ok we all wanted that at one time in our life.

    One more thing, we won't be loosing quite a few players, we will be re-loading...that is the deal in Div. I. You do not depend on others wash offs, you recruit and prepare them for the next season. ITS CALLED DEPTH CF.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X